I'm a moderate progressive Democrat. I've always considered myself evenly balanced between the plight of Palestinians and the need for Israelis to have a secure homeland.
But given the horrendous way Israel has been carrying out its war with Hamas since the terrorist attacks on October 7 of last year, which has now brought the innocent people in Gaza to the brink of starvation -- more than that, since many already have died from a lack of food -- I never will look upon Israel in the same way again.
Israel has squandered the goodwill that virtually the entire world felt toward it after Hamas killed 1,200 Israelis. Much of the blame belongs to Prime Minister Netanyahu and his extreme right-wing government.
However, polls show that most Israelis support the scorched earth, don't worry about the slaughter of over 30,000 people in Gaza (mostly women and children) warmaking policy of the Netanyahu government.
That's entirely in accord with the cruel, malevolent Old Testament God the Jewish religion worships. But it is entirely against modern views of how war should be conducted, which includes the requirement that every effort be made to protect civilians.
It seems clear that both Israel and Hamas are guilty of war crimes. That's to be expected of Hamas. It's a huge disappointment to those, like me, who thought Israel understood that the needless killing of innocent people is a moral disaster. Have Israelis forgotten the lesson of the Holocaust?
Apparently, since Israel is allowing the people of Gaza to suffer mightily from lack of food, water, medicine, and other essentials by blocking sufficient humanitarian aid from entering the country. A story in yesterday's Washington Post, "U.N. chief calls for 'unfettered' aid to Gaza as aid groups report imminent famine," describes what Israel has wrought. Here's how the story starts out:
Famine may already be happening in northern Gaza, and it risks spreading across the besieged enclave, plunging 2.2 million Palestinians into the broadest and most severe food crisis in the world, the globe’s leading body on food emergencies said Monday.
The new report from a cluster of international organizations and charities known as the Integrated Food Security Phase Classification initiative, or IPC, outlined a devastating situation with up to half the population of Gaza — 1.1 million people — facing catastrophic levels of hunger and starvation between now and July. The most immediately affected areas are in the northern regions, which Israeli forces cut off from the enclave’s southern half and which only a trickle of aid has been able to enter.
Compared with the IPC’s previous analysis in December, acute food insecurity in the Gaza Strip has deepened and widened, with nearly twice as many people projected to suffer those conditions by July. The most dire projection is based on an escalation of the conflict, including a ground offensive in Rafah.
In the IPC’s five-tier classification of food crises, Gaza now has the largest percentage of a population to receive its most severe rating since the body began reporting in 2004, Beth Bechdol, deputy director general at the Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO), told The Washington Post.
By comparison, today in Sudan, Somalia and Afghanistan — where millions are suffering crisis and emergency levels of food insecurity — none of the population falls into the worst tier of catastrophic food shortages, Bechdol said.
People in areas designated at Phase 5 are considered to be “starving” and facing a significantly increased risk of acute malnutrition and death.
“So, for Gaza to have 1.1 million people in IPC 5 is unprecedented,” she said. She added: “This is 100 percent a man-made crisis. There’s no hurricane, there’s no cyclone, there’s no 100-year flood. There’s no protracted year-on-year drought.”
The report is likely to add fuel to the increasingly sharp criticism of Israel from governments in the United States and Europe about the grim dimensions of the escalating humanitarian crisis in Gaza. On Monday, the European Union’s foreign policy chief, Josep Borrell, repeated his assertion that Israel was using starvation as a “weapon of war.” He noted that German Chancellor Olaf Scholz had recently told Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu that “we cannot stand by and watch Palestinians starve.”
“In Gaza we are no longer on the brink of famine; we are in a state of famine, affecting thousands of people,” Borrell said at the start of a conference on humanitarian aid for Gaza in Brussels. “This is unacceptable. Starvation is used as a weapon of war.”
Moamen al-Harthani, a 29-year-old resident of the northern Gaza town of Jabalya, described how people in the north were eating weeds and other plants to survive.
“There is no rice, no sugar, no beans, no lentils. … No fruit or vegetables,” Harthani said. “People eat the food of animals and livestock,” he said. Unable to find or afford flour, Harthani makes a bread-like substitute out of animal feed.
It's said that Israel is using starvation as a weapon of war. I heartily agree.
Any moral high ground Israel enjoyed after the October 7 attack by Hamas is gone, gone, gone. Israel is acting as cruelly as any terrorist organization. It just has better public relations, as this post on X says. Hassan isn't speaking specifically about using starvation as a weapon of war here, but his point applies to that also.
Here's two other X posts on the subject of famine in Gaza. Murphy is a United States senator.
Lastly, this is the final paragraph of a story in the March 25, 2024 issue of TIME magazine, "Spring won't bring Gaza relief."
The situation continues to "deteriorate day by day," the International Rescue Committee has said, noting that only a swift and lasting cease-fire would allow "the level of aid that the people of Gaza so urgently need to survive." In a recent study, Checchi and his co-authors projected that even in the absence of epidemics, an additional 58,260 Palestinians will be killed over the next six months if things remain unchanged. That figure jumps to 74,290 in the event of an escalation. "The way things are heading right now is consistent with our worst scenario," Checchi says, perhaps "even a little bit worse than that."
Comments
You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.