« Let's stop talking about "accidental" police shootings | Main | Police budget should be cut to pay for crisis response team »

April 14, 2021


Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

Could it be possible the city has a plan for the overstocked non-native maples? We don’t know because of the lack of communication, but assuming bad intent does not help the situation nor resurrect the trees.

It sounded like Milan (good on Heather for getting a response by the way, I never have) explained the city’s reasoning quite clearly. I agree communication should be better, but these trees are not Heather’s property and you are not the urban forester. Trees are not permanent, and removing damaged and infested trees for the good of the stand was Milan’s call. Perhaps finding ways to support the city’s tree program (like advocating for more staff) rather than blast the actions you don’t personally agree with would be more productive.

I am astonished at the Salem urban forester's rationale for destroying a splendid, reportedly healthy and thriving specimen tree: that is, to give two scrawny, less-successful trees on either side more growing room. I'm disappointed but not surprised that our new forester acclimatized himself so quickly to the City of Salem staff's culture. This incident increases my doubts that our "civil" "servants" can be reformed.

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been posted. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.


Post a comment

Your Information

(Name is required. Email address will not be displayed with the comment.)

Become a Fan