« Why legal marijuana may spur changes in Oregon land use laws | Main | Another day, another nonsensical Statesman Journal editorial »

February 25, 2015

Comments

I would revise 6 to read "Discourage Unused and Underused Space by Charging Owners for Degrading The City" -- instead of putting the city even more into the "subsidy for business" business, we let the market figure out what's best, by forcing building owners to pay a rising fee monthly for each month after a minimum (3?) that a developed lot or storefront within the downtown core remains vacant or underused.

The money would go into funds for downtown projects, so it would benefit the downtown businesses indirectly, and help ameliorate the burden they bear because other building owners let their properties be idle so long, exerting a drag on all downtown businesses.

In this way, instead of promoting graft and city government cronyism, we get a uniform, transparent policy that will strongly incent landlords to find and keep suitable tenants downtown, or sell to someone who will use the space themselves or wants to be a better landlord at rents the market is willing to pay. Right now, we're suffering from landlords who aren't paying high enough carrying charges on their buildings, so they're fine with no rent coming in too long. Rather than raise taxes generally, we should simply penalize the landlords who impose costs on downtown with their refusals to bring the rents down enough to get a tenant into the space.

#2 and #5 will never happen as long as we have a major east / west highway artery (Hwy 22) dumping traffic directly dead center in our city.
Until that problem is corrected, there are not enough bong hits, Ty chi dances, or "If you're happy and you know it clap your hands" songs to wish it into existence.
When traffic east / west can continue on Hwy 22 at 55mph AROUND the city center, then and only then will we have the quiet little hamlet that you dream about.
O.K back to what you were doing and no Bogarting....

Walker, I like your ideas. Penalizing property owners who choose to let a building sit idle (for tax reasons, or whatever) makes a lot of sense.

But seemingly this policy could co-exist with support for helping entrepreneurs start a new business once they've found a suitable and fairly-priced empty storefront to buy or lease.

I understand your concern about cronyism, as this is on evident display in Salem -- with tax breaks going to wealthy, well-connected corporations like Mountain West. However, if support for new small businesses could be done fairly and fairly inexpensively, this seems like a good thing.

A while back, we saw a plan for Salem downtown traffic management from the U of O architecture people that decreased the number of lanes of travel and increased space for other means of transport. It was awesome. It must exist somewhere.

Bill, here's a link to a discussion of the UO Sustainable Cities Initiative residency on downtown -

http://breakfastonbikes.blogspot.com/2011/07/tyranny-of-levels-of-service.html

In it is a link to the "Downtown Salem Circulation Study," which seems like it is the study you reference.

Chunks of that project moved forward into the City's own Central Salem Mobility Study, and asking the City to accelerate implementation of that would be a fine thing indeed.

I want to register my disagreement with Mr. Vanderpool. Sir, have you ever been to Vancouver, BC? The Economist ranks it the most livable city in North America. And guess what. It has no urban freeways or expressway loops. The cars and trucks just all have to slow down. And it works just fine. I have been there many times and there is almost no traffic congestion. The idea of a loop expressway is a stupid American invention that has destroyed the core of many cities. I'm so glad Salem doesn't even have the beginnings of one. We had enlightened City leaders who rejected the idea decades ago, back when the Federal government was handing out money for these monstrosities. I'm glad those days are over so our less enlightened leaders today cannot be tempted.

I want to register my disagreement with Mr. Scheppke.
Go to Google maps but don't go satellite. You will see HWY 22 highlighted in yellow.
As HWY 22 enters Salem Center , Marion, Ferry, Trade, Bellevue, 13th and a portion of Mission St are listed as HWY 22!!!!!
You actually prefer our city streets designated as a commercial gut?.
You SERIOUSLY think that is good route for 80000 - 110000 pound semi's, lost tourists and will work well with the artzy-fartzy
vision? Back to the map you will notice a slow curve on HWY 22 where edgewater merges, that if continued across the river and the slough would meet the end of Mission St perfectly. From the end of Mission St to 13th st. where 4 lanes begins is a very short distance.
You could even make the connection a fly-over so that the bums would have a dry place to sleep.
The current traffic design is chaos.
It is not a poor plan, it is the result of no plan.

Subsidies are to small businesses what sugar-loaded soda pop is to small children.

They LOVE it, and it's only when you try to take it away that you learn what a monster you've created by allowing your little tyke to have the super sweet easy cheap calories.

What the public treasury should subsidize are public goods that the market can't provide, where the beneficial outcomes are shared with everyone. That's not what small business is. When you subsidize small businesses, you sow the seeds of dependency and distortion, and for "Lemon socialism" -- privatized profits with socialized costs.

Parking is bad enough downtown, never put trees and medians in the middle of the street. All businesses downtown would suffer. Function comes before pretty.

melissa, the main function of Salem's downtown should be to make the area both economically vibrant and attractive to people.

The two obviously are connected. The more attractive to people downtown is, the more they will want to come there, which will lead to more sales and customers for downtown businesses.

It is proven fact that making a downtown easier to walk and bike in will lead to more people wanting to visit it. Nobody says, "Wow, let's go downtown to see the parking spaces."

As an urban planner said in a TEDx talk that I shared on my blog, you can have all the parking you want, but it doesn't matter if nobody wants to go there.

Salem doesn't have a downtown parking problem; it has a problem with the City not having enough money to pay for its parking garages.

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Working...
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been posted. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

Working...

Post a comment

Your Information

(Name is required. Email address will not be displayed with the comment.)

Strange Up Salem

Welcome to HinesSight

  • Salem Political Snark
    My local political rants are now made on this badass blog. Check it out. Dirty politics, outrageous actions, sleaze, backroom deals — we’re on it. 

  • Twitter with me
    Join Twitter and follow my tweets about whatever.
  • Church of the Churchless
    Visit my other weblog, Church of the Churchless, where the gospel of spiritual independence is preached.

  • Welcome to HinesSight. If this is your first visit, click on "About this site--start here" in the Categories section below.