I'm the secretary of our planned community's homeowners association (HOA). Our HOA has had to file liens on property owners who fail to pay their dues two years in a row.
The dues are only $185 a year. Payment plans are allowed. Volunteers do a lot of the work needed to maintain the common property (we also hire a contractor for mowing, spraying, bark mulching, and such). When dues aren't paid by some of our 90 property owners, the other owners have to make up the lost money.
Being the secretary, I have the not-so-fun duty of filing the liens with Marion County. I don't like doing this, especially if the person/people behind in their dues are having a tough time financially.
But I know that our HOA needs to be sure that even if dues aren't paid while someone is living here, when they sell their property the lien will have to be honored. Meaning, the HOA will finally get the unpaid dues.
I was wrong about being sure. Well, probably I was wrong.
We're still trying to figure out the legal ins and outs of what happens to a HOA lien in Oregon when a property goes into foreclosure. Currently it sure looks like HOA's get screwed (a non-legal but apt term) if a bank forecloses on a property that has a lien for unpaid dues on it.
I discovered this late last year after I got a phone call from a title company that would go nameless if I didn't call it AmeriTitle. A woman wanted to know what the annual HOA dues were, saying that the property was up for sale after being foreclosed on by a bank that also would go nameless if I didn't call it Wells Fargo.
I told her, adding "Of course, there is a lien on the property for unpaid dues, which I assume will be paid." That simple comment led to a series of complex back-and-forth exchanges between me, our HOA treasurer, AmeriTitle, and Wells Fargo.
In the end, we got stiffed (another non-legal but apt term). After several fruitless attempts to learn what the legal basis was for not honoring the HOA lien, I got a response from Amerititle that said:
Per Oregon Statute 94.709 ‘Whenever a homeowners association levies any assessment against a lot, the association shall have a lien upon the individual lot for any unpaid assessments…The lien is prior to a homestead exemption and all other liens or encumbrances upon the lot except:…(b) A first mortgage or trust deed of record.’
Per Oregon Statute 94.723 Common expenses; liability of first mortgagee, once a lot in a planned community is foreclosed upon the ‘mortgagee and subsequent purchaser shall not be liable for any of the common expenses chargeable to the lot which became due before the mortgagee or purchaser acquired title to the lot. The unpaid expenses shall become a common expense of all lot owners including the mortgagee or purchaser.’.
Per Oregon Statute 94.712 ‘An owner shall be personally liable for all assessments imposed on the owner or assessed against the owner’s lot by the homeowners association.’ Accordingly, the servicer on this property, Wells Fargo, paid the past due amounts owing against the lot according to the state statute, which is from the foreclosure sales date forward.
So we got paid for the few months of unpaid dues that accrued between the time Wells Fargo foreclosed on the property. But not for the several years of unpaid dues prior to that date. Seems unfair to me.
Our HOA lost out on about $300. However, another foreclosed property in our development owes considerably more. Those dues go to pay for maintenance of the common property, an asset of our community which increases considerably the value of homes and bare lots.
Sixteen states reportedly give HOA liens a "superlien" status, treating them as akin to property taxes: a bill that has to be paid by whoever forecloses on a property. I agree with this:
"The argument that HOAs should be senior to everything is like property taxes — they are part of preserving the collective value of the neighborhood," says Goodman, who represents servicers, HOAs and investors in distressed properties.
Confusing the issue, my Googling revealed quite a few references to Oregon being a superlien state. However, when I checked out the Oregon Statutes cited in the AmeriTitle letter (ORS 94.709, 94.723, 94.712), it sure seems like HOA liens get wiped out in a foreclosure.
Again, unfairly.
Wells Fargo is making plenty of money, along with other banks -- $4.9 billion in the third quarter of 2012. Billion. But they refused to pay our HOA $300 for dues that went toward increasing the value of the home and lot they foreclosed on, and recently sold.
Our HOA board of directors will have to decide what to do in the future, if it turns out that our liens for unpaid dues indeed are wiped out in a foreclosure. We could go after the previous owner who failed to pay the dues.
Collection Agency? Small Claims Court? Maybe.Since they refused to pay their dues while they lived here, almost surely a polite letter asking for the money is going to have even less effect after they've moved on following the foreclosure.
It's a tough situation.
I can (sort of) understand why a bank or other mortage holder doesn't feel like they're responsible for dues incurred by the owner of the property being foreclosed on. However, the bank is reaping the benefits of our HOA's maintenance work on the common assets of our development.
Oregon law may be on the banks' side. Right and wrong, though, often is different from lawful and unlawful.
If anyone reading this knows more about the subject of HOA liens and foreclosures than I do, a highly distinct possibility, please leave a comment and enlighten me. Or email me (link in the sidebar).
The HOA should have foreclosed on the property and as a super priority state would have been paid before Wells Fargo.
Posted by: j | March 11, 2014 at 01:20 PM
you hoas are greedy bastards that should be locked up for extortion. you want to reap the benefits of interest fees and late charges. not to mention extortionate attorneys fees, You are all like vultures.....................trying to devour your prey
Posted by: karen smith | April 29, 2015 at 10:49 PM
We had an owner who did not pay the monthly dues. We had a judgement against the homeowner.
Then bank account was close so we recorded the lien. We waited two (2) years till the Bank started foreclosing, in this time the owner did not respond to our pleas, did not open the door, did not accept certified mail. This owner has borrowed money almost double as the house it worth. The foreclosure happened over a year ago and now the bank wants us that we sign off so they can sell the property without paying the delinquent amount owed before the foreclosure.
Posted by: Rene E. Vanoni | November 05, 2015 at 02:35 PM
Absolutely correct. HOA are for profit. Furthermore, there are law offices that cheat,lie, deceive homeowners. These law offices thrive on deception. Their lively hood is based on homeowners that have financial difficulties. They have well paid lobbyist that mold the laws to suit them the best. Its about money, easy targets. If you fight their distortion then you have to pay even more. Time, for a change.
Posted by: jack r | March 28, 2016 at 08:42 PM
I would like to correct a statement by Jack R posted March 28, 2016. Not all HOA's are for profit. The HOA for which I am Secretary/Treasurer is a non-profit agency. The majority of the money collected from the individual homeowners in the form of assessments (or dues if you like) is used to pay for maintaining all the grounds, (which is all the private property of individual homeowners), painting the exteriors of the buildings and reroofing the buildings. A much smaller amount goes for pest spraying, HOA insurance, tax preparation, office supplies and corporation registration. There is also a small stipend for the officers of the HOA for the hours of time they spend operating the HOA.
If one or more homeowner's fail to pay their annual assessments and a lien on the property is not collected by the HOA, it becomes a shared expense of all the remaining homeowners. That means if there is not enough money to pay the groundskeeper or do the painting or reroofing, those remaining homeowners must pony up additional funds to cover the costs for their own units in addition to the unit that was foreclosed. How is that fair in any way? Why aren't the banks covering that cost as part of doing business (buying and selling property and perhaps granting loans to people who can't really afford them)?
Get your facts straight Jack.
Posted by: Karen Harvey | July 25, 2016 at 06:36 PM
HOA’s should be banned.
You are all power hungry and cruel organizations that advantage of homeowners.
My HOA has been harassing us for years since we moved here just because I have an accent. They themselves and even our neighbors would sit in their cars in front of our house and take pictures, complain about ridiculous things and even placed a garbage can on our property when we were not there for 6 months and then wanted to charge us money.
I have everything recorded on security camera.
They are prejudice hateful sick petty people.
They abuse the little power they have.
HOA’s should not exist or have no legal power so they can’t abuse it.
They are disgusting.
Posted by: Dave | March 21, 2025 at 11:45 PM
I HAVE NOT MEtT ONE HOA REPRESENTATIVE WHOM
WAS NOT A NASTY PERSON.
Posted by: David | March 21, 2025 at 11:53 PM