« We give Keizer Rapids Dog Park "two paws up" | Main | Tear down Salem's Courthouse Square! Make it a park. »

April 09, 2012


Just a quick note, I love this part of your blog: "As I suspected, no response. Just more blather about censorship and such. Hey, trolls: good luck with publishing your no reason to worry about global warming B.S. in a scientific journal under a pseudonym like asswipeXS." Heeheeheehee, omgosh, I can't stop laughing, thank you!!!

Brian - you may have arrived at the end of your tolerance as concerns global warming deniers, but the planet has not arrived at that destination - yet. Perhaps you are equating disregard with denial?

More and more disasters attributable to weather patterns are going to occur. Eventually, given enough time, it will be impossible for large segments of the human population to survive, and those who do survive will be quite busy not enjoying themselves.

I am not a denier. I just don't care.

I support your efforts, Brian, to make trolls more accountable. Unfortunately, Facebook authentication is not an identity panacea. Anyone can create a fake Facebook account associated with a real email address, even if it violates their terms of service.

As a progressive and critical thinker, I understand your tolerance for opposing views. Remember, though, that these trolls come from a perspective that doesn't care about integrity, only about pushing an agenda. They have no place in an thought-provoking forum since thinking is not their objective (especially when it's evident from their comments that they intend no contribution to the discussion and instead a highjacking of it with disinformation).

You shouldn't feel that you are violating your own terms by blocking clear attempts to subvert your message and a healthy discussion. Consider them viruses that needed to be filtered with a intelligent operator. As yet, those can't be automated.

Got here via a friend's facebook link. It's not clear what you're planning to do other than continue to ask them to ID themselves. Perhaps you could have a three-strikes-you're-out approach. Ask them for real ID 3 times, and if they don't reply, block them from commenting. If you would be willing to use a Facebook link, but can't, this might be a good alternative.

Willie... I recognize the difference between disregard and denial. Disregard can be defended philosophically, though personally I disagree with that attitude. Disregarding cancer in one's own body, or letting go and dying -- that's an individual choice. Disregarding the health of the entire planet -- that's a choice which has massive collective consequences for both present and future generations.

JackL... thanks for the thoughtful thoughts. Yes, liberals/progressives like me tend to go overboard being open, accepting, and tolerant of jerks, whether in cyberspace or physical space. If someone is disruptive and deceptive, they shouldn't be tolerated.

If I'm sitting at a table in a coffeehouse and someone came up with a mask on and started ranting loudly about something, breaking into a quiet conversation, I'd tell the jerk to go away. But on the Internet, anonymous commenters with a cyber-mask on get away with such rudeness. I've steadily lost patience with this, which is why I've gone to comment moderation. Asking for a Facebook identity in certain instances is another step in that direction.

Jodi... I have indeed stopped publishing the anti-science guy's comments until he reveals his real life identity. Facebook isn't ideal, but along with a Facebook log-in I'd want to use some other ways to make sure that I know who is leaving Big Oil-friendly global warming-denying comments.

I suspect this guy will continue to hide in the dark and shift to some other anonymous accepting blog/web site, repeating his untruths there. Someone who is scared of the truth fears openness, accountability, and the light of personal responsibility.

I dont know how you tolerated it for so long. I know i couldn't have. How bad was it? Can you point to some of these trolls lying handywork?

giddyup, here's an example of comment exchanges between me and "DJ," the guy who's been the both blatant anti-science global-warming denialist. Read the comments on this post:

Thats not what i was expecting. You guys are testy with each other but that was actually a good read and a spirited debate. I think i even learned some things. The sources (yours and his) were mostly all global warming believers so i couldn’t really find any intentional lies. Just minor disagreements among the sources. Wikipedia on the carbon tax maybe was an exception but that’s Wiki for you. Still hardly what i expected. You must have worse examples of lies for banning him not?

giddyup, you're welcome to your opinion. I disagree. DJ is remarkably obtuse and dogmatic when it comes to denying human-caused global warming.

By the way, I didn't ban him. I simply asked him to send me a Facebook log-in, along with, perhaps, other information to confirm his real world identity -- just as countless newspapers and web sites do with online commenters.

Got to ask... your writing style and comment demeanor remind me of DJ's. Would you know him by any chance? Am wondering if you might be related. Perhaps intimately, like identical twins?

Just an intuition. Just wondering.

[Note from blogger: giddyup, hopefully you can understand why I thought you and DJ could be the same person, because you both have the exact same IP addresses. Wow, what an amazing coincidence! Out of all the places in the world you and DJ could reside, you both are Comcast users in Portland, Oregon with the same IP address.

Anyway, from now on if you, or DJ, or anyone else ever wants to post a comment about global warming that denies the scientific consensus that (1) global warming is happening, and (2) humans are largely responsible for it, you, or DJ, or anyone else will need to provide a Facebook log-in link and possibly other confirmation of your real identity.

That's the way of science: accountability and openness. Those who choose to hide in the cyberspace shadows, as you also want to do, testify to their anti-science, anti-truth nature by their fear of putting their real names behind their false assertions. -- Blogger Brian]

I laughed i cried i got creeped out. But i get your paranoia. At leats before you had DJ in your sights but now he could be anyone. Its the same paranoia at work here. Most people dont facebook since three were fired in the past two years. If they dont like you they find a recipe you sent to grandma on your day off and twist it into a fireable offense. Yes i exaggerate but not by much. I like the hours i get so in this economy it is no big sacrifice. Like Betty White said Facebook is a big waste of time.

Dear Brian,

It appears to me: 1) global warming is happening, and 2) (some) humans may be contributing to this fact by their modern technological actions and pollutants. However, I do not know that humans are the only effector of this fact nor that they are "largely responsible" for it.

I agree that attentive actions ought be engaged in with regard to this fact - but there may be no true "solution" that will solve it. (Cause and effect will occur however it will - regardless of our preferences. [And we have no way of freely willing elsewise.])

Robert Paul Howard

Robert, climate scientists have found that the vast majority of global warming, especially most recently, has been caused by humans. See:

This analysis concludes:
"The agreement between these studies using a variety of different methods and approaches is quite remarkable. Every study concluded that over the most recent 100-150 year period examined, humans are responsible for at least 50% of the observed warming, and most estimates put the human contribution between 75 and 90% over that period (Figure 2). Over the most recent 25-65 years, every study put the human contribution at a minimum of 98%, and most put it at well above 100%, because natural factors have probably had a small net cooling effect over recent decades (Figures 3 and 4).

Additionally, in every study over every timeframe examined, the two largest factors influencing global temperatures were human-caused: (1) GHGs, followed by (2) human aerosol emissions. This is a dangerous situation because as we clean our air and reduce our SO2 emissions, their cooling effect will dissipate, revealing more of the underlying GHG-caused global warming trend. Note that not all studies broke out the effects the same way (i.e. only examining 'natural' and not solar or volcanic effects individually), which is the reason some bars appear to be missing from Figures 2 to 4.

...A wide variety of statistical and physical approaches all arrived at the same conclusion: that humans are the dominant cause of the global warming over the past century, and particularly over the past 50 years. This robust scientific evidence is why there is a consensus amongst scientific experts that humans are the dominant cause of global warming."

Dear Brian,

Thank you for providing the reference to "how different people subjectively see the world, which we call 'objective facts'" (even though "Patonomics" could not "reach agreement" with his fellow commentors).

But even if "[t]here is nothing truly objective about how humans [will in the future] experience the world[,]" the generations which follow us may well suffer for what we (and our parents and grandparents) did over the last century (with no malice aforethought). As I said: "Cause and effect will occur however it will - regardless of our preferences. [And we have no way of freely willing elsewise.]" Yet, some have contributed far more to those "causes" than various of the rest of us have.

Robert Paul Howard

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been saved. Comments are moderated and will not appear until approved by the author. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.


Post a comment

Comments are moderated, and will not appear until the author has approved them.

Your Information

(Name is required. Email address will not be displayed with the comment.)

Strange Up Salem

Welcome to HinesSight

  • Salem Political Snark
    My local political rants are now made on this badass blog. Check it out. Dirty politics, outrageous actions, sleaze, backroom deals — we’re on it. 

  • Twitter with me
    Join Twitter and follow my tweets about whatever.
  • Church of the Churchless
    Visit my other weblog, Church of the Churchless, where the gospel of spiritual independence is preached.

  • Welcome to HinesSight. If this is your first visit, click on "About this site--start here" in the Categories section below.