« Republican presidential candidates disrespect reality | Main | A 2011 Nissan Leaf could be sprouting in our garage soon »

August 25, 2011

Comments

"we live in the natural world". scuse me but i didn't see mother nature supply the internet this message is carried on...or the computer keys that created it...or the house you're living in Hinesight or the food you eat every day...or the roads you drive on. unless you're living under a tree somewhere creating these messages on "naturally" occurring phenomena i'm not aware of. Humans bend the world around them to their uses...and we are conservative about the damage we do...but tell me how you exist only using what the "natural world" provides?

Lars, everything humans do and everything humans are, that's the natural world. We are made of the same 92 naturally occurring elements that the rest of the observable universe is. We evolved from a single cell common ancestor just like every other living creature on Earth has.

We are primates, the most intelligent ones on the planet. We are no less natural than the robin which built a nest in our carport this year. Our "nests" are more complex, that's all. We humans depend for our existence 100% on the natural world. That's where the energy we need to survive on comes from.

Nature. The food we eat, the air we breathe, the water we drink. It all comes from nature. Our bodies are natural; our brains are natural. Every cell of which we're made is natural. So how can our actions, our behaviors, our thoughts not be natural?

Being highly evolved primates, the problem is that our natural actions can cause natural results that are detrimental to our continued natural survival. Unfortunately, anti-science right-wingers don't realize this.

"Everything humans do and everything humans are, that's the natural world." Huh? C'mon, Brian, now you're just making crap up.

If everything humans do is natural, what's your definition for synthetic? How do you define artificial?

nat.u.ral
adjective /ˈnaCHərəl/ 
Existing in or caused by nature; not made or caused by humankind

http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&safe=off&biw=1440&bih=814&q=natural&tbs=dfn:1&tbo=u&sa=X&ei=9gFXTuT1OcHkiAL-tMmVCQ&sqi=2&ved=0CCEQkQ4

I remember Lars when I lived in Oregon. I used to switch to the more calm and measured rhetoric of Michael Savage. What a sweetheart. A dear man. So misunderstood.

Do you get Dennis Prager? He is conservative, but reasonably and fairly so, I think.

Michael Medved, another conservative, is pretty smart and a history buff. You may disagree but you better come prepared with plenty of ammo if you want to shoot him down. He does have a rather passionate dislike of street bums. He doesn't like them shitting in his neighborhood park and leaving needles around.

How about Dennis Miller. Here is a pretty smart guy as well who makes sense but only if you can process all his obscure cultural metaphors and references. If you can keep up with him, the dude can be a riot.

Then there is Hugh Hewitt. Liberals have to hate this guy. He's good at what he does.

Then there are the partisan Rush, Hannity and Laura Ingraham. I enjoyed Rush back in the late 80's when Martin Sheen was grandstanding about the plight of the homeless. Rush commissioned a bus and delivered a load to Martin's house. I don't think they got past the gate. "Put 'em up somewhere, but not in my neighborhood!"

Agree or disagree, all these conservative commentators and plenty more get good ratings.

I wonder why liberal talk radio, if you can find it, gets poor ratings?

Hmmm?

Oh well, liberals have the news media in general and places like the Daily Kos and Huffington Post, not to mention the once great, but now thoroughly corrupt and irresponsible NY Times.

>> I wonder why liberal talk radio, if you can find it, gets poor ratings?

Because liberals are too busy thinking and doing for themselves, unlike conservatives, who have to be told what to do and think.

I am a conservative. I used to be a listener. I used to be a friend. There are a lot of us "used to be's" out here. He is losing listeners. He does not have the ability to come up with original thought, but he does love to argue. He will argue heresay. He is an arrogant, ambitious man with average talents. The only thing he works really hard at is self promotion. He has hit his glass ceiling here in Portland.

It's is true. Liberalism is a mental disorder.

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Working...
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been posted. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

Working...

Post a comment

Your Information

(Name is required. Email address will not be displayed with the comment.)

Strange Up Salem

Welcome to HinesSight

  • Salem Political Snark
    My local political rants are now made on this badass blog. Check it out. Dirty politics, outrageous actions, sleaze, backroom deals — we’re on it. 

  • Twitter with me
    Join Twitter and follow my tweets about whatever.
  • Church of the Churchless
    Visit my other weblog, Church of the Churchless, where the gospel of spiritual independence is preached.

  • Welcome to HinesSight. If this is your first visit, click on "About this site--start here" in the Categories section below.