I admit it: I’ve become obsessed with pointing my finger at the Bush administration’s failure to respond to the devastation caused by Hurricane Katrina.
Several times today friends asked me, “How are you?” I’d respond, “If you’re just talking about me and my life, I’m fine. If you include how I feel about the lives that have been lost by Department of Homeland Security and FEMA bungling, I’m not fine at all.” And then I’d take off on my finger-pointing rant.
It’s been a beautiful sunny warm day here in Oregon. I started off wanting to simply enjoy it, to be in the here and now. Then, driving into Salem this morning I heard right-wing talk show host Lars Larson plug his upcoming broadcast from Washington where the anniversary of 9/11 will be “celebrated.”
“We’ve got to make sure 9/11 will never happen again,” Larson said. “We must never forget the lessons of 9/11.”
For the rest of the day I couldn’t stop thinking, “Hey, 9/11 did happen again in the guise of Hurricane Katrina. The final death toll hasn’t been calculated yet, but estimates range into the thousands. And we did forget the lessons of 9/11, because the Bush administration failed to heed the clear warning that a category 4 hurricane was likely to hit New Orleans, sitting on its hands when many lives could have been saved.”
My already-dark mood wasn’t improved when, listening to the radio while driving home late in the afternoon, I heard Homeland Security Secretary Michael Chertoff intone, “After this is over there likely will be some serious changes in how the federal government reacts to natural disasters.”
Are you kidding me? Bush and company have had four years to make serious changes to how the federal government reacts to disasters both natural and unnatural. Now you want more time, Chertoff? That’s bullshit, which is all that we’ve been getting from the Bush administration.
I’m sick of it. This is the time for finger-pointing and getting mad as hell. This is the time to never forget the victims of Hurricane Katrina. This is the time to vow to honor the dead and homeless by casting votes against the Bush administration in November 2006.
In today’s New York Times columnist Paul Krugman says that people on the Gulf coast have been “Killed by Contempt.” Meaning, the present federal government has contempt for the role of government in helping people who can’t help themselves.
A political crony, Michael Brown, was appointed FEMA director. FEMA funding was slashed after 9/11. Those were conscious decisions to enfeeble government’s ability to respond to a disaster. So Krugman is absolutely right: the Bush administration has killed people by contempt.
On the radio today several times I heard a heartbreaking interview where a New Orleans official, Aaron Broussard broke down in tears on NBC’s “Meet the Press.” You have to hear Broussard’s voice to get the full impact of the story he told about a woman in a nursing home dying after waiting four days to be saved.
You can read about this disgrace here and here (or read the continuation to this post.)
[Monday morning update: The New Orleans newspaper, the Times-Picayune, published a devastating "Open letter to the President" on Sunday. The editorial calls for every FEMA official to be fired, starting with political flack Michael Brown, the FEMA director. Great idea.]
Tearful Official Slams Fema
NEW ORLEANS, Sept. 4 (UPI) -- A New Orleans official is calling for congressional hearings into the federal government`s handling of the aftermath of Hurricane Katrina.
'It`s not just Katrina that caused all these deaths in New Orleans here,' said Jefferson Parish President Aaron Broussard on NBC`s 'Meet the Press.'
'Bureaucracy has committed murder here in the greater New Orleans area, and bureaucracy has to stand trial before Congress now.'
He broke down in tears as he told of an elderly woman who drowned after being promised that help was on the way.
'The guy who runs this building I`m in, emergency management, who`s responsible for everything,' said Broussard, 'his mother was trapped in St. Bernard nursing home and every day she called him and said, `Are you coming, son? Is somebody coming?` And he said, `Yeah, Mama, somebody`s coming to get you. Somebody`s coming to get you on Tuesday. Somebody`s coming to get you on Wednesday. Somebody`s coming to get you on Thursday. Somebody`s coming to get you on Friday.`'
'And she drowned Friday night,' said Broussard. 'She drowned Friday night.'
I believe this: http://kiro.liquidviewer.net/kiro-od/mayornagin.asf
is a link to the interview with New Orleans' mayor, Ray Nagin.
Posted by: Keith | September 05, 2005 at 08:27 AM
Well said. I'm generally apolitical. I have some liberal leanings, it's true, but I also have some conservative leanings. In general, I'm a moderate. I self-lable as a small-l libertarian.
All this is background so that when I say I loathe George W. Bush, you understand that I don't necessarily loathe all Republicans. This man is a menace, not just to our country, but to the world. His administration has been disastrous, and I can't imagine how anyone can do anything other than point a finger at him, his advisers, and their policies.
I wouldn't have said this a few days ago. I'm saying it now.
Posted by: J.D. | September 05, 2005 at 12:27 PM
Not a big fan of the war in Iraq, I don't care for everything our current president does. But I don't understand the current favorite national passtime of Bush bashing. Seems to me that New Orleans in particular, being in the unique and borderline conditions it finds itself, should have been ever vigilant and well rehearsed for any possible weather threat. The local city authorities being sensitive and knowledgeable should have reated more quickly to their local threat and relied on plans in-place and resources earmarked for such emergencies. If these are inadequate, then the next level kicks in - the state. And, of course, then the national forces get rallied.
This was a natural disaster of incredible proportions. Just last year the nation witnessed four lethal hurricanes in the state of Florida - which is still in the process of recovery. Did those lessons go unheeded by the Gulf coast populace? Are our citizens so dependent on the government that they need to be told - several times - to flee harm's way? What of those who refused to leave - are their current circumstances the fault of the Bush administration?
Bush is not to blame for Katrina nor 9-11 for that matter; give the guy a break - he's got a tough job.
I'm guessing that had Bush early on declared an evacuation, the mayor and governor would have cried that he was overstepping his bounds. And, should he fire all FEMA officials - in the middle of an ongoing rescue and relief effort - would be totally irresponsible. Honestly assess that scenario and it's apparent that would cause more problems than solve. So why make noise about it? Perhaps our pundits and celebrities are too privilged and granted unearned platforms. It's easy to coach from the stands.
I live in Texas and our state has welcomed nearly half the population of New Orleans. I can tell you for a fact that this disaster was no respecter of race, creed or income. Our 'dome, civic centers, schools and churches are filled with all types of evacuees and all are being cared for.
There's always room for improvement and Bush certainly has administrative issues to fix - like all presidents. But these desparate times call for immediate humanitarian responses that meet the basic needs of these displaced people and help them cope and prepare for all the adjustments they are being forced to make. There is a time and place in this great nation of ours - even for outspoken, contrary armchair politicians - but it's not now. When it plays out, we'll see that it is the nation and its good hearted individuals, families, religious organizations and corporate sponsors that will accomplish the rebuilding and relocation.
Why in all this finger pointing are the mayor and governor exempt?
Posted by: Anonymous Relief Volunteer | September 07, 2005 at 06:49 AM
Anonymous Relief Volunteer, no one is exempt from blame concerning the Hurricane Katrina relief fiasco. But the federal government deserves the most blame.
Read this timeline of events.
http://www.thinkprogress.org/katrina-timeline
Then try to tell me that FEMA director Brown and Homeland Security secretary Chertoff shouldn't be fired. Better yet, tell the relatives of the people who died because of the federal incompetence.
The Bush administration fiddled while New Orleans drowned. That's a fact. All the right-wing excuses in the world can't cover up the facts. Dead bodies floating in the water: there's a fact for you.
Posted by: Brian | September 07, 2005 at 11:17 AM
The fact of dead bodies floating in the water is indeed tragic. What compounds the tragedy is that those people should not have been there and suffered those consequences.
There is a chain of responsibility:
1) Individual or head of the family
2) Local city officials/Mayor
3) Parish president/county commissioner
4) State officials/Governor
5) FEMA
6) President
Not exonerating Bush nor excusing any delay in his response, it appears that many levels of responsibility failed before it became his burden. I read the chronology you posted and was shocked by the administration's disregard. But that's only part of the story: http://www.opinionjournal.com/extra/?id=110007219
This also is a chronology of events but a year prior, written by someone who also had to deal with a natural disaster.
If the call goes out for Bush and FEMA to be found accountable and be replaced, the same scrutiny should be applied to the entire chain of responsibility. I think that it should start locally and work upwards.
New Orleans, Biloxi, Gulfport were not founded by the Bush administration. Bush was not the civil engineer that designed protection for a Category 3 hurricane when it was a Category 4 hurricane that made landfall. These are local problems and the inadequacies were no secret. And these inadequacies existed before Bush became president. He makes for an easy and popular target. He should be held accountable for his (in)actions but the first lines of defense were local - and critical. And they failed. The whole response/relief system is broken and needs overhauling - not just the Bush administration.
The most pressing, primary and immediate need is to help these displaced people and distraught families; provide them with the essentials to live - food, clothing, shelter. Find them temporary employment until they are able to return and rebuild.
Texas and the nation as a whole has done a great job aiding the evacuees. It's a daunting task and it will be a long, arduous process but the evacuees will heal and will return to rebuild. Now's the time to lend a hand to help them.
Posted by: Anonymous Relief Volunteer | September 08, 2005 at 06:19 AM
Brian,
It seems that the Anonymous Relief Volunteer has some support - from the media!
http://www.chron.com/cs/CDA/ssistory.mpl/front/3344347
Just out of curiosity - have you personally made efforts to help these unfortunate people?
Posted by: Bob | September 08, 2005 at 07:09 AM
Bob, we have--so long as "people" is defined to include animals. My wife is a huge animal lover, as am I (though less passionately). She's contributed to the Humane Society of America efforts to save non-human Hurricane Katrina victims. Often animals are people's best friends, so it doesn't make sense to rescue people and leave their animals behind.
I'll admit to mixed feelings about donating for relief efforts. As the New York Times editorializes today (http://www.nytimes.com/2005/09/08/opinion/08thu1.html?hp) the federal govt. wastes countless billions on pork spending, the Iraq war, and such. The American people shouldn't have to pay for relief efforts out their own pocket. That should be the role of government--to care for people who can't care for themselves.
There's plenty of money around to rebuild the Gulf coast and get people back on their feet. But the Bush administration has squandered our previous budget surpluses on tax cuts for the wealthy and sending our $$$ overseas to Iraq where the payoff has been minimal, to say the least.
Lastly, I agree with this analysis:
http://www.dailykos.com/storyonly/2005/9/8/133522/9857
The debate is over about whether Bush, Chertoff, Brown, et. al. seriously screwed up. It's over. Even (open-minded) conservatives agree. Yes, some people who hold a "Bush can do no wrong" faith-based approach to politics won't open their eyes. But the blind shouldn't be dictating national policy.
A bottom line for me is that Bush had four years after 9/11 to get "homeland security" straight. Obviously he hasn't done that. As many other people have been saying, if the Bush administration can't respond to a hurricane that says "I'm coming to destroy you!" many days in advance, what trust can we put in Homeland Security to protect us against an unannounced terrorist attack. Bush has failed. End of story.
Posted by: Brian | September 08, 2005 at 10:41 AM
Well, Brian, I don't really consider animals to be people even though I am an animal lover myself.
Have you ever had personal contact with any victims of natural disasters? Or perhaps domestic violence? Anyone who has been affected by circumstances beyond their control? When you personally interact with them, you'll find that all they want is relief or a way out. They don't care who is at fault or who to blame. When you personally care for these victims, I think your heart may change.
Granted, President Bush did not act in a manner that many would applaud. But one man, no matter how much power he may hold, cannot make a difference overnight. But when many indivuals take action, great things happen.
I think if you would personally become involved in any sort of humanitarian effort, your outlook and focus (as well as your heart) would change.
Posted by: Bob | September 09, 2005 at 04:33 PM
Brian,
I agree with your points on the chanin of command of responsibility wholeheartedly. But, lets put the blame where it really lies - Gov. Blanco. She has had an axe to grind with Pres. Bush since she took office. Example; the visit to Cuba to sell $15 million of sugar cane. This was a power struggle on her part, the President told her two days in advance that he could prepare for emergency funding and releif, and she refused help. He even asked 24 hours in advance, and she said she had the situation under control.
Lets face it, she is not a leader, and her indecisiveness caused alot of untimely events to fall in place. I do feel the federal government could have reacted without her approval, which came on Wednesday, two days later, since this was a disaster.
She made the matter worse by NOT reacting and NOT showing any leadership qualitites at all. She definitely wont get reelected.
Posted by: Monkebznss2001 | September 14, 2005 at 07:37 PM