Here's the second installment of an interchange Osho Robbins, a frequent commenter on this blog, had with ChatGPT, the artificial intelligence chatbot. The first installment is here.
Even though I said in that first post that I'd share the rest of the chat in two additional posts, I decided to include all of the remaining chat in this second post. Because it's so long, you'll need to click on a continuation link at the bottom of this post to read the remainder of it.
This morning I shared in a post an interesting comment from Appreciative Reader, another frequent commenter on this blog, So if you want to see how a human looks upon God, in contrast to the artificial intelligence of ChatGPT, check out "People can't define God in any way they like."
Since I'm a big believer in spiritual independence, I resonated with a general sentiment that ChatGPT repeated numerous times using similar language in response to the questions asked by Robbins. Here's one example. ChatGPT speaks wisely here.
It is important to note, however, that the concept of enlightenment and the role of the perfect master may be understood differently in different spiritual traditions, and there may be different criteria for what constitutes spiritual realization and the ability to guide others on the path towards it. Ultimately, each individual must determine their own spiritual path and the guidance that is most helpful to them.
---------------------------------------------
since oneness is about "ONE" how can there be individual souls in oneness?
The concept of oneness can be understood in different ways depending on the spiritual or philosophical tradition in question. In some traditions, oneness may be understood as a state of unity or interconnectedness in which all beings and phenomena are ultimately one and the same, beyond all distinctions and separations. In other traditions, oneness may be understood as the ultimate reality or essence of all things, beyond all dualities and limitations.
In the context of the teachings of Radha Soami Satsang Beas (RSSB), the concept of oneness is often used to refer to the underlying unity and interconnectedness of all creation, including the human soul and the divine. While the ultimate reality may be understood as a state of oneness, it is also believed that individual souls exist within this oneness, and that the ultimate goal of spiritual practice is to realize this oneness while still retaining individual consciousness and awareness.
According to RSSB teachings, the human soul is believed to be a unique individual entity, capable of experiencing its own unique journey of spiritual evolution and growth. While the soul may ultimately merge with the divine and realize its oneness with all creation, it is believed that this realization does not involve the loss of individuality or consciousness, but rather a transcending of ego and separateness to achieve a state of higher awareness and unity.
In this sense, the concept of oneness in RSSB teachings does not necessarily negate the existence of individual souls, but rather suggests that individuality is ultimately part of a larger unity that includes all of creation.
it is said that "there is only the one nothing else is real"
The idea that "there is only the One and nothing else is real" is a common theme in many spiritual and philosophical traditions, including Advaita Vedanta, Taoism, and certain schools of Buddhism.
In Advaita Vedanta, the One is often understood as Brahman, the ultimate reality that underlies all creation and is identical with the true nature of the individual self (atman). The idea is that all phenomena in the world, including the individual self, are ultimately illusory or unreal in comparison to the absolute reality of Brahman.
Similarly, in Taoism, the One is understood as the Tao, the underlying reality that governs all creation and transcends all distinctions and dualities. The idea is that all phenomena in the world, including the individual self, are ultimately transitory and impermanent, and that true wisdom and fulfillment can be found by aligning oneself with the Tao and transcending attachment to the material world.
In both cases, the idea that "there is only the One and nothing else is real" suggests that the true nature of reality is beyond the limitations of language and concepts, and that ultimate reality cannot be grasped through ordinary modes of perception and understanding. Instead, it is believed that realization of the One requires a direct experience or insight that transcends the illusions and limitations of the material world.
It is worth noting, however, that interpretations of the idea of the One may vary among different traditions and individuals, and that the concept of ultimate reality or absolute truth is often approached in different ways depending on cultural, historical, and personal factors.
what does RSSB say about this
In the teachings of Radha Soami Satsang Beas (RSSB), the concept of oneness or unity is also central, but it is approached in a different way than some other spiritual traditions. While the ultimate reality is often referred to as the One, the emphasis is not on negating the reality of the individual self or the material world, but on recognizing the underlying unity and interconnectedness of all creation.
According to RSSB teachings, the ultimate reality is a state of consciousness that is beyond the limitations of the material world, and that can be directly experienced through meditation and spiritual practice. This state of consciousness is often referred to as Sach Khand or the Realm of Truth, and is described as a state of infinite consciousness, bliss, and love.
While the ultimate reality is believed to be beyond the limitations of the material world, it is also believed that the individual self is real and that the material world is a reflection of the ultimate reality. The goal of spiritual practice is therefore not to negate the reality of the self or the world, but to recognize their underlying unity and to align oneself with the ultimate reality through meditation, selfless service, and ethical living.
In this sense, the idea of oneness or unity in RSSB teachings is not a rejection of the individual self or the material world, but a recognition of their ultimate reality and interconnectedness with the divine.
in the ultimate state of oneness, is there time and space?
In many spiritual traditions, the ultimate state of oneness or unity is described as a state that transcends time and space. In this state, there is often said to be no separation between the individual self and the ultimate reality, and no distinctions or limitations of any kind.
For example, in Advaita Vedanta, the ultimate reality of Brahman is described as "beyond time, space, and causation," and as the underlying reality that transcends all concepts and limitations. Similarly, in certain schools of Buddhism, the ultimate reality of Nirvana is described as a state of "suchness" or "emptiness," which transcends all distinctions and dualities and is beyond time and space.
In RSSB teachings, the ultimate reality is often referred to as Sach Khand or the Realm of Truth, and is described as a state of infinite consciousness, bliss, and love. While the ultimate reality is said to be beyond time and space, it is also believed that the individual self can experience this reality through meditation and spiritual practice.
It is worth noting, however, that interpretations of the ultimate state of oneness may vary among different traditions and individuals, and that the concept of ultimate reality or absolute truth is often approached in different ways depending on cultural, historical, and personal factors.
in a state of no-time and no-space can there be individual souls and where will they exist
In a state beyond time and space, the concept of individual souls as we understand them in the context of our physical reality may not be applicable. This is because the concept of individual souls is often based on the idea of separate, distinct entities with individual identities and characteristics. In a state of ultimate oneness or unity, these distinctions may not apply.
Some spiritual traditions suggest that in the state of ultimate oneness, the individual self merges or dissolves into the ultimate reality, and that the concept of a separate individual self may become irrelevant. In this sense, the question of where individual souls exist in a state beyond time and space may not be relevant, as the concept of individual souls as separate entities may not apply in that state.
However, it's important to note that different spiritual traditions have different views on this subject, and interpretations may vary. Ultimately, the nature of the ultimate reality or state of oneness is considered beyond human comprehension and description, and it may be impossible to fully understand or describe it through language or concepts.
what does it mean to transcend the ego
Transcending the ego generally means moving beyond the limitations and illusions of the individual self, and realizing a deeper, more universal aspect of reality. In many spiritual traditions, the ego is seen as the part of the individual self that identifies with separateness, individuality, and the material world, and that is driven by desires, fears, and attachments.
To transcend the ego means to recognize that the ego is not the true self, but rather a temporary construct that can be transcended through spiritual practice and self-realization. This can involve letting go of attachments, overcoming fears and desires, and cultivating a deeper sense of connection and oneness with the world around us.
Transcending the ego can lead to a sense of inner peace, freedom, and liberation from suffering. It can also be seen as a step towards spiritual awakening and self-realization, as it allows one to connect with a deeper sense of truth and purpose beyond the limited confines of the ego.
In many spiritual traditions, practices such as meditation, self-inquiry, and mindfulness are used to cultivate awareness and move beyond the limitations of the ego.
does RSSB lead to the transcending the ego
Radha Soami Satsang Beas (RSSB) is a spiritual organization that aims to help individuals achieve spiritual growth and self-realization. One of the key teachings of RSSB is the importance of transcending the ego, as this is seen as a crucial step towards achieving spiritual liberation.
RSSB teachings suggest that the ego is a temporary construct that arises from identification with the body and the material world, and that it creates a sense of separation and isolation from the true self and the ultimate reality. According to RSSB, transcending the ego involves recognizing the illusory nature of the ego and cultivating a deeper sense of connection with the inner self, others, and the universe as a whole.
RSSB teaches that the practice of meditation is a powerful tool for transcending the ego and achieving spiritual growth. Through regular practice, meditation can help individuals cultivate inner awareness and develop a deeper understanding of the nature of the self and the universe.
Overall, while there are many different approaches to spiritual growth and self-realization, RSSB teachings suggest that transcending the ego is a key step towards achieving a deeper sense of inner peace, spiritual growth, and liberation.
paltu sahib, a famous mystic says "there is only ONE - there is no other" please explain
Paltu Sahib was a 19th-century Indian mystic and poet who is known for his spiritual teachings and poetry. One of his key teachings is the idea that there is only one ultimate reality, which is often referred to as the Divine, God, or the Ultimate Truth.
When Paltu Sahib says, "there is only ONE - there is no other," he is expressing the idea that there is only one true reality, and that everything else in the universe is a manifestation or reflection of that ultimate reality. This can be understood as a statement about the nature of existence, and the idea that all beings, objects, and phenomena are interconnected and part of a larger whole.
From this perspective, the concept of individuality and separation is seen as an illusion that arises from the limitations of human perception and understanding. The ego, or the sense of individual identity, is seen as a temporary construct that arises from the identification with the body and the material world, and that ultimately obscures the deeper truth of oneness and interconnectedness.
The idea of oneness is a common theme in many spiritual traditions, and is often associated with the idea of enlightenment or spiritual liberation. Through practices such as meditation and self-inquiry, individuals may seek to transcend the limitations of the ego and realize the deeper truth of oneness and interconnectedness that underlies all of existence.
was the buddha enlightened
According to Buddhist tradition, the Buddha, also known as Siddhartha Gautama, achieved enlightenment under the Bodhi tree after six years of seeking spiritual realization through various ascetic practices. He realized the Four Noble Truths, which state that suffering arises from craving and attachment, and that by eliminating craving and attachment, one can achieve liberation from suffering and attain a state of peace and happiness known as Nirvana.
The Buddha's enlightenment is considered to be a profound realization of the nature of reality and the human condition, and is seen as a key milestone in the development of Buddhism. The Buddha's teachings and insights have inspired millions of people over the centuries and continue to be a source of guidance and inspiration for many Buddhists today.
It is worth noting, however, that the concept of enlightenment may be understood differently in different spiritual traditions, and there may be different criteria for what constitutes enlightenment or spiritual realization. Nevertheless, within the context of Buddhism, the Buddha is widely regarded as an enlightened being who attained a profound understanding of the nature of reality and the path to liberation from suffering.
is gurinder dhillon also enlightened
The question of whether Gurinder Singh Dhillon, the current spiritual leader of Radha Soami Satsang Beas (RSSB), is enlightened is a matter of interpretation and belief. In RSSB, the term used for enlightenment is "God-realization," which refers to a state of spiritual awakening in which an individual has direct experiential knowledge of the divine or ultimate reality.
According to the teachings of RSSB, God-realization is considered to be a rare and profound state of spiritual awakening that is attained through a combination of spiritual practice, grace, and the guidance of a living spiritual teacher, or perfect master. While the ultimate realization of God may be considered to be beyond words and concepts, it is often described in terms of experiencing the unity and interconnectedness of all things and realizing the true nature of the self and reality.
In the context of RSSB, many followers consider Gurinder Singh Dhillon to be a living spiritual teacher and a perfect master who has attained God-realization and is capable of guiding others on the spiritual path. However, the ultimate realization of God is considered to be a deeply personal and individual experience, and it is up to each individual to determine their own level of spiritual attainment and understanding.
but only an enlightened person can guide others towards enlightenment
In many spiritual traditions, it is believed that only an enlightened person can fully guide others towards enlightenment, as they have the direct experiential knowledge of the ultimate reality and the path to attaining it. In the context of Radha Soami Satsang Beas (RSSB), the living spiritual teacher, or perfect master, is seen as a guide who can offer spiritual guidance and support to seekers on the path towards God-realization.
According to the teachings of RSSB, the perfect master is considered to be a rare and special individual who has attained God-realization and is able to impart spiritual knowledge and guidance to others. The perfect master is seen as a link between the individual seeker and the divine, and is believed to be able to provide the necessary guidance and support to help the seeker progress on the spiritual path.
It is important to note, however, that the concept of enlightenment and the role of the perfect master may be understood differently in different spiritual traditions, and there may be different criteria for what constitutes spiritual realization and the ability to guide others on the path towards it. Ultimately, each individual must determine their own spiritual path and the guidance that is most helpful to them.
is brian hines enlightened
As an AI language model, I cannot determine whether Brian Hines, the author of the Church of the Churchless blog, is enlightened or not, as enlightenment is a deeply personal and subjective experience. The term "enlightenment" is often used to describe a state of spiritual awakening in which an individual experiences a profound shift in consciousness and gains direct experiential knowledge of ultimate reality.
Whether or not someone is considered to be enlightened may depend on the beliefs and criteria of the spiritual community they are part of. However, it is important to remember that enlightenment is a personal and subjective experience, and each individual's path to spiritual realization may be unique. Ultimately, the determination of whether someone is enlightened or not is a matter of personal belief and spiritual experience.
is zen a valid path to enlightenment
Yes, Zen is considered a valid path to enlightenment by many practitioners of Zen Buddhism. Zen is a school of Buddhism that emphasizes the practice of meditation as a means of attaining enlightenment or awakening. The word "Zen" is derived from the Japanese pronunciation of the Chinese word "Chan," which is itself a translation of the Sanskrit word "Dhyana," meaning "meditation."
Zen teaches that enlightenment or awakening can be experienced directly, beyond the realm of intellectual understanding or conceptual thinking. This is achieved through the practice of meditation, which aims to cultivate mindfulness, concentration, and insight into the nature of reality.
Zen is a rigorous and demanding practice that requires dedication and discipline, but many practitioners have found it to be a powerful means of personal transformation and spiritual growth. Zen is a valid path to enlightenment for those who resonate with its teachings and are willing to undertake the rigorous practices it requires.
is rssb a valid path to enlightenment
Radha Soami Satsang Beas (RSSB) is a spiritual organization that teaches a path to spiritual awakening or enlightenment. The path taught by RSSB is based on the teachings of the saints and mystics of India, and emphasizes the practice of meditation as a means of attaining spiritual realization.
Whether or not RSSB is considered a valid path to enlightenment may depend on the beliefs and criteria of the spiritual community one is part of. However, many followers of RSSB have reported experiencing profound spiritual transformation and realization as a result of their practice.
Ultimately, the effectiveness of any spiritual path in leading one to enlightenment depends on the individual's level of dedication, sincerity, and effort in their practice, as well as factors such as their previous spiritual experiences and the guidance of their spiritual teacher. Therefore, the validity of RSSB as a path to enlightenment may vary from person to person.
is sikhism a valid path to enlightenment
Sikhism is a monotheistic religion founded in the 15th century in the region of Punjab, in what is now India and Pakistan. Sikhism teaches a path to spiritual liberation or enlightenment through devotion to the one divine creator, and emphasizes the importance of meditation, service, and ethical conduct.
Like any spiritual path, the effectiveness of Sikhism as a path to enlightenment depends on the sincerity and effort of the practitioner, as well as the guidance of a qualified spiritual teacher. Many followers of Sikhism have reported experiencing spiritual transformation and realization as a result of their practice.
Ultimately, whether or not Sikhism is considered a valid path to enlightenment may depend on the beliefs and criteria of the individual or spiritual community. However, many people have found the teachings and practices of Sikhism to be a powerful means of spiritual growth and transformation.
is buddhism a valid path to enlightenment
Buddhism is a path to spiritual awakening or enlightenment that was founded by the Buddha over 2500 years ago. Buddhism emphasizes the Four Noble Truths, which describe the nature of suffering and the path to liberation from suffering, as well as the practice of meditation and ethical conduct.
Like any spiritual path, the effectiveness of Buddhism as a path to enlightenment depends on the sincerity and effort of the practitioner, as well as the guidance of a qualified spiritual teacher. Many followers of Buddhism have reported experiencing spiritual transformation and realization as a result of their practice.
Ultimately, whether or not Buddhism is considered a valid path to enlightenment may depend on the beliefs and criteria of the individual or spiritual community. However, Buddhism has been practiced and revered by millions of people for over two millennia, and many have found its teachings and practices to be a powerful means of spiritual growth and transformation.
if i get initiated into rssb will i meet god
In the teachings of RSSB, the goal of initiation is to help the disciple develop a personal relationship with God through meditation on the inner spiritual Sound and Light, and to ultimately achieve spiritual liberation from the cycle of birth and death.
The process of initiation involves receiving the sacred name or mantra from the Guru and learning a specific meditation practice to access the inner spiritual realms. Through consistent practice, disciples are encouraged to develop a deep connection with their inner selves and the divine.
However, whether or not a disciple experiences meeting God through this process ultimately depends on the individual's own level of spiritual development, sincerity, and effort. The experience of meeting God is said to be a profound and deeply personal one, and may vary from person to person.
is god real
The existence of God is a matter of personal belief and faith, and there is no universally accepted proof or disproof of the existence of God. Different cultures and religions have their own interpretations and beliefs about the nature of God.
In the teachings of RSSB, God is described as an infinite, loving, and compassionate being who is the source of all creation. Through meditation and spiritual practice, disciples are encouraged to develop a personal relationship with God and experience the divine presence within themselves.
Ultimately, whether or not one believes in the existence of God is a matter of personal belief and interpretation, and can vary greatly among individuals and cultures.
are athiests correct in their view of god?
The beliefs of atheists vary, but generally speaking, atheists do not believe in the existence of any gods or deities. Atheism is a belief system that asserts that there is no evidence for the existence of God, and therefore it is more rational to assume that God does not exist.
It is important to note that beliefs about God are subjective and vary widely among individuals and cultures. While some people believe strongly in the existence of God, others do not believe in God at all.
Therefore, whether atheists are correct in their view of God is a matter of personal belief and interpretation, and opinions on this subject will vary among individuals.
but if they are saying "there is no evidence for god" surely that is correct?
Atheists who assert that there is no evidence for God may be making a factual claim, based on their interpretation of the available evidence. However, it is important to recognize that the lack of evidence for God's existence is not proof that God does not exist.
The existence of God is a matter of philosophical and theological debate, and there are many different arguments and perspectives on this subject. Some people argue that there is ample evidence for God's existence, while others argue that the lack of evidence is evidence that God does not exist.
Ultimately, whether or not God exists is a matter of personal belief and interpretation, and opinions on this subject will vary among individuals.
but atheists are not saying there is no god, only that there may be or might not be - give me proof
It is important to note that atheism is a lack of belief in a god or gods, rather than a positive assertion that no god or gods exist. Therefore, not all atheists necessarily make the claim that there is no god. Some atheists may simply assert that they have not been presented with sufficient evidence to believe in a god.
As for proof of the existence or non-existence of God, this is a complex and deeply philosophical question that has been debated for centuries. There are many arguments and pieces of evidence that people use to support their beliefs or lack of beliefs in God, but ultimately it comes down to one's personal interpretation and worldview.
In the absence of objective, universally accepted proof of God's existence or non-existence, individuals must rely on their own reasoning, experience, and intuition to arrive at their beliefs or lack thereof.
is there a blue fairy
The blue fairy is a fictional character from the story of Pinocchio. As far as we know, there is no actual blue fairy in the real world.
is there any more evidence for god than evidence for the blue fairy
There is a lot of debate and discussion regarding the existence of God, and the evidence for or against it is largely subjective and depends on personal beliefs and experiences. Different people have different interpretations of what constitutes evidence for God. Some people believe that personal experiences, religious texts, and philosophical arguments provide evidence for the existence of God. Others may argue that there is no empirical evidence for the existence of God and that belief in God is a matter of faith. Ultimately, the question of the existence of God is one that individuals must decide for themselves based on their own beliefs and experiences.
but in terms of empirical evidence
Empirical evidence refers to evidence that can be observed, measured, and tested through experiments or other objective means. The existence of God is generally not considered an empirical question because it cannot be directly observed, measured, or tested using the scientific method.
However, many people believe in God based on personal experiences, such as religious or spiritual experiences, feelings of awe and wonder at the natural world, or a sense of meaning or purpose in life. While these experiences may not be empirical evidence in the strictest sense, they are still valid reasons for individuals to believe in God.
Ultimately, whether or not one believes in God is a matter of personal belief and faith, rather than empirical evidence.
so, in terms of empirical evidence only, would you say there is no god
As an AI language model, I cannot make personal beliefs or judgments. However, I can tell you that the existence of God is a matter of debate among philosophers, theologians, and scientists. Some argue that there is empirical evidence for God's existence, while others argue that there is no empirical evidence to support the existence of God. It ultimately depends on one's personal beliefs and interpretation of available evidence.
you said "Some argue that there is empirical evidence for God's existence" - can you substantiate this?
Yes, some arguments for the existence of God are based on empirical evidence. One such argument is the cosmological argument, which asserts that the universe had a beginning and that something must have caused it to begin. This cause is posited to be God.
Another argument is the teleological argument, which points to the apparent design and order in the universe as evidence for a designer or creator, which is posited to be God.
There are also arguments based on religious experiences and personal encounters with God, which are considered empirical evidence by those who have had such experiences.
It's worth noting that not everyone finds these arguments convincing or considers them to be empirical evidence for the existence of God. It is ultimately up to each individual to evaluate the evidence and come to their own conclusions.
but if god created the universe, who created god?
This is a classic philosophical question that has puzzled thinkers for centuries. The idea of an infinite regression of causes is a difficult concept to grasp, and it is one of the reasons why many philosophers and theologians believe that there must be an uncaused cause, or a first cause, to explain the existence of the universe. This is often referred to as the cosmological argument for the existence of God.
However, there are also other philosophical arguments for the existence of God that do not rely on the idea of a first cause, such as the ontological argument, the moral argument, and the teleological argument. These arguments are based on reason and logic, rather than empirical evidence, and are intended to show that the existence of God is a necessary conclusion based on certain premises.
It is important to note that these arguments are not universally accepted, and there is ongoing debate among philosophers and theologians about their validity. Ultimately, the question of whether or not God exists is a matter of belief and faith, rather than scientific proof or empirical evidence.
which came first, the chicken or the egg? please explain
The question of which came first, the chicken or the egg, is a classic philosophical and scientific puzzle. From a biological perspective, the answer is that the egg came first. This is because the chicken, as we know it today, evolved from earlier species of birds, which laid eggs that contained genetic mutations leading to the development of the first chicken. So, in this sense, the first chicken would have hatched from an egg laid by a bird that was not quite a chicken.
However, from a theological perspective, the answer may be different. The creation story in many religions describes the creation of all living things, including the first chicken, as being the work of a divine creator. In this case, the chicken would have been created by God, and there would be no egg that came first.
Ultimately, the question of which came first, the chicken or the egg, may not have a definitive answer, as it depends on the perspective from which the question is being asked.
how can the chicken come first?
One possible explanation for the chicken coming first is based on the theory of evolution. According to this theory, over a long period of time, a species of bird that was not yet a chicken gradually evolved into what we now recognize as a chicken. This would mean that the first chicken would have hatched from an egg laid by a bird that was not quite a chicken, but very similar to it. In other words, the chicken came first in terms of the evolution of the species, even if the specific chicken that laid the first chicken egg was not quite a fully-formed chicken. However, this is just one theory and there are other perspectives on the question of which came first, the chicken or the egg.
Well, reading through many of the response from ChatGPT regarding spiritual matters, it often ends up with the obvious statement that it is a matter of personal faith, belief and/or interpretation. This is all it can do, answer according to the thinking or concepts that are current at the time.
It’s obvious that all biological organisms survive primarily through being able to gather information. The human brain is the epitome of information gathering and processing, hence our amazing abilities to advance and improve our lives in all manner of ways.
Gathering information is obviously beneficial as a specie and also as individuals – we wouldn’t be able to function and exist without basic information. Accepting and incorporating information of a spiritual or religious nature, and using that to justify beliefs and existence can only have the effect of inflating a sense of self or ego. Consequently, perpetuating the separative, dualistic behaviour and approach to life that is the main cause of much of our suffering and conflict.
Play with information devices – if that benefits or amuses – but beware of using it to justify our beliefs and ourselves. I just hope that future comment on this blog continue to be of a thoughtful and inquiring nature and not the re-hash of computer generated ‘thinking’.
Posted by: Ron E. | April 17, 2023 at 02:37 AM
I don't know who created God. But I know that it's not God or religion that's destroying Portland Oregon.
There's no longer an REI in Portland. Closed due to rampant shoplifting and burglaries.
Nike has also closed one of its Portland stores, telling city officials the closure was due to shoplifting. Meanwhile, Walmart closed its only two Portland stores, citing financial reasons.
Last week, Coava Coffee Roasters, a coffee chain local to Portland, announced it is closing its downtown location due to the “extreme violence and criminal activity” its employees have endured.
Portland is no outlier, what's happening there is happening in most U.S. cities with a diverse population. Total anarchy, lawlessness, and violence. In no way can religion be said to be a cause of this breakdown in civilization.
What do I plan to do about it? I will do the same thing that all white progressive do -- I will live far far away from those neighborhoods. I mean, "oneness" is a concept that's best served in the abstract, and not even the most fervid white liberal would ever dare live in a diverse urban neighborhood.
Posted by: SantMat64 | April 18, 2023 at 07:45 PM