« Is it necessary to make our life into a narrative, a story? | Main | Believing in free will isolates us »

January 16, 2023


Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

It is very difficult to have free will with peer pressure of the rssb society. The initiated blind parents pressure, the plagerised and heavily doctered books, the 2 satsangs ( means company of the truth, which in the case of rssb is a complete mockery), then the seva, which is nothing but slavery to propagate their fake cult, takes away the free will you are born with. You need strong guts, strength , and be free enough to use simple logic carry out some basic research to get out of gurinder singh dhillon spell. Once your out you are free again as long as you keep the rssb agents at bay. Realise that Gurinder singh dhillon is a murderer, a narcissist, an angry jealous man - do your independent research. He is the very opposite to God.

From the book -Free Will- by Sam Harris:

...Free will IS an illusion. Our wills are simply not of our own making. Thoughts and intentions emerge from background causes of which we are unaware and over which we exert no conscious control. We do not have the freedom we think we have.
Free will is actually more than an illusion (or less), in that it cabnnot be made conceptually coherent. Either our wills are determined by prior causes and we are not responsible for them, or they are the product of chance and we are not responsible for them.

Ah, free will, always an interesting subject. Advocates of free will essentially support some type of agent or agency that is free of influence from our biological, physiological and psychological processes. To date, no such agent has ever been found – just assumed, believed in or perhaps hoped for.

The illusion of free will goes hand-in-hand with the illusion of having a separate self. They are two sides of the same coin. Quite readily, the self can be co-opted as the vehicle that is above and separate from the biological processes, so understanding the self-structure is needed to dispel the myth of a separate self as an agent that has free will. Which means to understand the mental processes, primarily the mind – the part of a person that feels, perceives, thinks, wills, and especially reasons – is imperative if one is interested in self-study.

It is probable that intellectual understanding (though important) can only take one part way. Possibly, what else is required is an honest introspection, an aware enquiry into the processes that produce the mind – in fact, into what is the mind. Maybe meditation can be of help here or perhaps just cultivating an attitude of just watching, observing the total organism – both mental and physical – in its relationship with itself and its environment.

The result may be that for ourselves, we can begin to lose the sense of being a separate self (along with all the egoistic sense of specialness that arises) and reclaim our naturalness – and interconnectedness with ourselves and our environment.

No free will = no guilt.

I think existentialists wrestle with this problem from similar sounding premises. What does it mean essentially to be human. We can see from our own self experiences and the perceived experiences of others that there are limiting facts that confine our being. Ie. Height, intelligence, athleticism etc.. Historically we've wrapped up a lot of these facts into metaphysical realities ie. Character, personality, motivation etc.. Religion gave us a language for soul, spirit, notions of permanence. Typically most come into notions of self with assistance of learning right and wrong good and bad. Pretty early as self is still an extension of the adult caregiver. We really need to feel on the side of right and good just to survive. The premise that existence precedes essence vs essence precedes existence flipped earlier western notions and metaphysics. Yes freedom, individual choice, and exercising an overarching plan for a self, is rare, often futile and probably fleeting - but not necessarily pure fabrication. Questioning the value of holding others to the impossible standards of free will is worthwhile. Separating the baby from the bathwater is also

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been posted. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.


Post a comment

Your Information

(Name is required. Email address will not be displayed with the comment.)


  • Welcome to the Church of the Churchless. If this is your first visit, click on "About this site--start here" in the Categories section below.
  • HinesSight
    Visit my other weblog, HinesSight, for a broader view of what's happening in the world of your Church unpastor, his wife, and dog.
  • BrianHines.com
    Take a look at my web site, which contains information about a subject of great interest to me: me.
  • Twitter with me
    Join Twitter and follow my tweets about whatever.
  • I Hate Church of the Churchless
    Can't stand this blog? Believe the guy behind it is an idiot? Rant away on our anti-site.