« "Our God is a Woman! Our Mission is Protest! Our Weapon are bare breasts!" | Main | Afterlife myths enabled early humans to cope with fear of death »

October 19, 2015

Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.


Something else of some interest!

http://www.hindustantimes.com/india/shahid-wife-mira-likely-to-visit-dera-radha-soami-beas/story-c3WEAP3X921W9Hsv6fccKK.html

"Interestingly, even the spiritual guru is expected at the wedding."

http://daily.bhaskar.com/news/ENT-BOW-photos-shahid-kapoor-mira-rajputs-match-was-arranged-at-this-spiritual-organisat-5030017-PHO.html

Prior to finding this blog a few weeks ago, I only knew of you from your book "God's Whisper, Creation's Thunder," in which you confidently claim that experimentation in "spiritual science" is just as valid a way of exploring reality as experimentation in physical science.
In light of this post and its links, however, it seems that your diligent spiritual science experimentation in the decades since you wrote GWCT has yielded, well, pretty much nothing at all really, and I'm therefore wondering whether you now think that your valorization of spiritual science in GWCT (which I very much enjoyed reading btw) was somewhat overstated.

-
God and Sunshine is an apples and pears comparison

Sunshine you can know partly
God you don't

So, . . how to love a phenomenon you don't know at all

You can see the words as giving a little flute ( perfectly tuned ) and let it try to play with the great best ever orchestra of the planet
The child will certainly grep the meaning of vibrations each day somewhat more

This grows so exponentially that the love for the donor of that flute
becomes colossal

But if you despise the maker this can not work

777

Just prior to seeing this post, I was meditating. I have been using a variety of "non-directive" meditation approaches learned from web sources. All are inspired by TM, but are much cheaper and don't require membership in a cult. Some, like NSR, use mantras. (David Spector, who is NSR's head honcho in the US, posted comments on one your earlier mantra posts, and you and he had an extensive exchange.) Some like CMR, don't use mantras. (CMR is a non-directive technique that uses a "comfort zone" as a vehicle, anchor, or whatever for awareness when one becomes caught up in thoughts.) The non-directive nature of these techniques seems to involve three aspects: An allowing attitude toward thoughts; a gentle, easy, non-judgmental return to the anchor or vehicle at whatever sharpness or dullness the anchor reappears with, when one recognizes that one has been caught up in thoughts to some extent or other; and (here is the key) an effortless awareness (of the mantra or at least the fact of meditation). You don't try to hear the mantra or repeat it to yourself. You let it come to you and allow it to become a subtle thought, to change, or to disappear altogether as "it" chooses. (The last aspect is what I suspect David Spector had in mind when, in his comments on another of your mantra posts, he said that you were not practicing a mantra technique in the way prescribed by TM or NSR.) In any event, regardless of the differences in techniques, all of the non-directive techniques seem to be built on some notion of transcending, although whereas NSR emphasizes this, CMR doesn't. Despite taking an effortless approach and following the written and/or recorded directions, I have never experienced the blissful experience of transcendence described by Spector and others. That's okay. I don't dwell on it because my goal is a little peace and relaxation once or twice a day. Anyway, right before I saw your post, I sat down to do a CMR session, and as I got into it, I spontaneously started using my breath as a vehicle and anchor. I didn't focus on my breath, or try to notice its subtleties. I simply lightly and easily returned to just an easy awareness of the gross feeling of breathing whenever I realized I was actually thinking actively, and then I let the awareness of the breath fade away, allowing myself to experience whatever, including thoughts, and returning to my breath only upon realizing that I was actively thinking. The meditation was quite enjoyable and relaxing, and I still feel pretty good. I didn't get spacey, experience a transcendental moment, or have any super special insights. I just enjoyed it. Will I do the same meditation again? I hope so, but I do believe in non-directionality enough not to force the approach or to try to reproduce the experience. Afterwards, again, before seeing your blog on the uselessness of mantras--which I really think is a blog about the uselessness of the very notion of transcending--I noted in my daily journal (where I record my workouts, meditation sessions, and number of beers per day)--that the approach of that meditation may have been too bodily for transcending, but I never transcend anyway, and the point is to relax in my body, not transcend to some pseudo-plane. Then I saw your blog post, and thought, "Yup."

"Currently, I still enjoy simply being aware of what is right around me -- both inside and outside of me."

You got it Brian.

I'm enjoying Tom Campbell (physicist, consciousness researcher) videos at the moment.

"Meditation, being aware of your consciousness is more natural than breathing. What you have to do is get out of the way of it. Its not that you have to do something special to meditate, what you have to do is get yourself out of the way and let yourself be in that larger awareness space... thats just natural to you, thats where you should live all the time. So its all about what you have to stop doing. So meditation is about NOT doing, not about doing, its not another technique to learn with your intellect to force yourself to be in a meditation state... That meditation state is just you, your consciousness. Thats where you live, thats where you belong and all you have to do is get out of the way and you can be there."


Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Working...
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been saved. Comments are moderated and will not appear until approved by the author. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

Working...

Post a comment

Comments are moderated, and will not appear until the author has approved them.

Your Information

(Name is required. Email address will not be displayed with the comment.)

Welcome


  • Welcome to the Church of the Churchless. If this is your first visit, click on "About this site--start here" in the Categories section below.
  • HinesSight
    Visit my other weblog, HinesSight, for a broader view of what's happening in the world of your Church unpastor, his wife, and dog.
  • BrianHines.com
    Take a look at my web site, which contains information about a subject of great interest to me: me.
  • Twitter with me
    Join Twitter and follow my tweets about whatever.
  • I Hate Church of the Churchless
    Can't stand this blog? Believe the guy behind it is an idiot? Rant away on our anti-site.