« Truly "living in the moment" would be horrible | Main | First sermon from the Church of What the Fuck »

June 08, 2012


Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

I've found that my nose for religiosity is extremely sensitive these days too. The slightest whiff sets off alarm bells in my head.

And yes, I so badly WANTED TO KNOW!! It drove me just about nuts. But now mystery is fine. Just exploring life as it is, as it presents itself, is enough. Peace at last.

I don't think Frege is saying anything too outrageous. I mean, I've never read one of his books, but by the examples you give, I don't think he's spewing religiosity.

In my opinion, and totally take it with a grain of salt, a lot of people who jump the fence from super religious to non-religious end up having this idea that anything that is "feel good" or uses language that reminds us of "spirituality or mysticism" is inherently bad. I think Frege is just talking about non-duality -- which is a contradiction automatically if you use language. (Then again, what else are you going to use?) I'm not going to sit here and type the "words are sign posts" speech that everyone's heard a thousand times, but I do think it's good to remember that it is a contradiction to talk about it.

(And now I'm going to contradict myself) Life and death are two parts of a whole. They aren't one but they aren't two. Thinking of them as one thing is wrong and thinking of them as two things is also wrong. They're both one thing and two things. I also think viewing them as either one of the extremes (Absolute Annihilation and Eternal Life) is what gets us into trouble.

Also, a lil' bit more off topic but still on topic, why is there an inherent grab towards life? People like to talk about the non-duality in a "positive way." They say things like, "When good and bad disappear, you'll be absorbed into eternal bliss." Last time I checked, bliss is noted as a "positive" attribute, which is why people are attracted to it because it's "good". That's not non-duality. That's a positive favored duality.


Good points made.

When one is blogging(a dualistic activity) about non-duality, one is using dualistic wordage. Wordage can be very satisfying and produce pleasure within the mind. That said, the mind/ego has some sort of need to blog, maybe and maybe not.

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been posted. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.


Post a comment

Your Information

(Name is required. Email address will not be displayed with the comment.)


  • Welcome to the Church of the Churchless. If this is your first visit, click on "About this site--start here" in the Categories section below.
  • HinesSight
    Visit my other weblog, HinesSight, for a broader view of what's happening in the world of your Church unpastor, his wife, and dog.
  • BrianHines.com
    Take a look at my web site, which contains information about a subject of great interest to me: me.
  • Twitter with me
    Join Twitter and follow my tweets about whatever.
  • I Hate Church of the Churchless
    Can't stand this blog? Believe the guy behind it is an idiot? Rant away on our anti-site.