« Take a look at Best of Raptitude 2010 | Main | Religions (and RSSB) should come with a guarantee »

January 07, 2011


Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

" The big question, he says, is "who" has all these states of consciousness?"

Metzinger says there is no one at home inside our heads to realize the self is an illusion.
quote poster

Who am I, or Am I a Who ? A La Ramana Maharshi. How can such a simple question
lead to enlightenement ?

Because the answer to this question is
that by which knowing, all else becomes

It causes a complete revolution in
the brain.

It takes more courage to tackle this question then any other endevor in life.

This is why U. G. Krishnamurti said,
If people knew what enlightenment was,
they would not touch it with a ten foot
bardge poke."

Consciousness is temporal and runs in
flahes of microseconds. It is not
permenant. It is like the frames on a
movie film. It has been declared a delusion
by Dr. Susan Blackmore.

The Grand Delusion.

That is why a magician is needed,
not a Guru.

To realize no self, is to realize there
is no hope of everlasting life.

Only a deadly honest true seeker ventures
on to such ground.

It is the ultimate death.

It announces the Supreme Futility.

Mankind is the insane God believer.

So, we destroy the earth with our
Supreme vanity.

The earth is an insane asylum.

We are an animal that evolved....
only to go mad.

Than what would you answer to Descartes that argued: I can doubt anything exept the fact that I can doubt. Therefore I must exist?
I agree that our identity can shift to anything like Sartre showed we can identify with the objects and become like living zombies.
I'm not speaking about our self image that is a mental illusion but about the feeling of self that can take many shapes.
Jung talked about the process of individuation that was acompannied by dreams about circles or rings. The ring is an archetype of the Self, and the process of individuation was described by Jung as a shifting of the identification from the outside of the circle to the centre. He didn't argue that the centre does not exist but that our present identification is an illusion. So his argument is more that we can view life from the ouside in, normal identification with the body. Our from the inside out what means that we identify with something not material. Call it the soul.
Another example is the thinking experiment with a blind girl that studied everything about seeing. She new all the equations and descriptions. But the first time she saw light she experienced something new that she did not know before. Therefore subjective experience is more that objective experience. And that something is what distinguishes zombies from us. Read Chandler about the distinction between us and machines.

I meant Chalmer, it was a long time ago that I studied that :)

so who is a serial killer then, for example? How will s/he learn if not for some kind of self?

The Mad Hatter running around looking for his center that can't resolve until he vanishes?

Brian you wrote: "Now, though, I'm beginning to suspect that there's no root, no core, no kernel, no center to me."

The problem may be the fabricated I is looking a for a center but refuses crucifiction. It is a scary matter. A bit of voidness here and there, well OK as long as I can come back and chat with my girlfriend, have a beer and watch the 49ers.

Many years ago I took some LSD (one of many times back then). This particular experience was seminal. All the pieces and components of what formed 'me' in my mind:

memories, friends, relationships, knowledge, objects, my body, thoughts, ideas, became fractured similar to Picasso's cubist stuff.

All these components of "me" were sort of floating in space helter skelter, separate and disjointed. At first I was panic stricken as this "break up" occured until nothing was left. It was a sort of death. There was no locus of assembledge. No 'me'.

But despite this breaking up of 'me' into fractals, there remained a formless matrix that was aware and alive, but not as any sort of form or aspect that could be described. It simply was. It definitely was.

As 'I' settled into this awareness I became more comfortable and found that nothing was lost except a temporary amalgamation of this formlessness into form. I saw that creations were formed by "crystalization" of this formlessness into intricate, vast, symetrical mandalas of conception... Universes that would manifest as dreams and then dissipate into limitless luminosity like bubbles emanating from and back into a cosmic infinity.

I saw that was how creation worked, that I and each one of us from bug to man were one of these mandalas, interwoven and yet individual, manifesting infinitely out of the "aliveness" of the formless super-matrix, if you will.

Reincarnation was understood as everything being everything in timelessness. There was nothing that anyone, anything had never been or would be. It was all interlinked, interwoven in a flowing flux, all time, all life, all forms. Eternally and in an instant.

Let me tell you this was way cool and "I" basked in it immeasurably.

Eventually, the little pieces of 'me' began to rejoin bit by bit until finally I was I once again.

For days I felt weightless as if a huge burden had been lifted off my back. Mundane concerns were dealt with in an attitude of lightness and confidence that all would fall together as it must, and it did.

As time went by this sort of wore off and I gradually returned to my former self much the way cement gradually hardens and holds the bricks together. It was not a bad thing.
It's just how things work.

The "matrix" is always there in and as us forever. We are it and it is us. No difference.

Don't worry. Enjoy your life. All is well.


Can you fit the thought..

"I don't particularly like the idea that I don't exist"

..into the thought of Brian ?

To Be ...... or Not to Be

Do we have a choice ?

I think ... therefore I am ?

But, is the "I" permenant, or temporal ?

According to Dr. Susan Blackmore consciousness
is temporal and exists in micro seconds.

Continuous consciousness is described by her
as a delusion on continuity and in fact does
not exist.

Consciousness did not cause the universe,
it was an end product, or an effect
of evolution.

Nietzsche had predicted this.

The rapid fire of the neurons creates
the illusion consciousness moves continuously.

Our existance exits in flashes.

Those micro flashes identify with the body

The micro flashes appear to us as if
we are the screen watching and feeling
all experiences.

We feel as if is is our Self.
An experiencer. A noun.

But, we in fact a verb, not a noun.

Consciousness is a verb, not a permenant noun.

We have identified our temporal consciousness
with a Greater Consciousness. That greater
Consciousness does not exist.

Nor does our little 'self' have a Greater Self
to be identified with.

Neither consciousness, nor a self exists,
according to Susan Blackmore.

The Guru capitalizes on these old hat
fabrics of ancient rhetoric to enhance

Science has debunked them.

People still think these are issues
and don't realize science has already
debunked the Guru.

The self and Self we would like to identify
with do not exist.

Yet we claw for an eternal life after death.
We will not let go of Heaven or Anami.

We feel we must exist at all costs forever.

We lash out at those whom tell us there
is no forever for us.

The greatest fear in the world, is the fear
we will not exist forever.

That fear has created religion and Gurus.

Can you live without fear ? Can you let go ?

Knowing this is all there is for you ?

Can you live knowing your consciousness
is as thin as a piece of paper, which only
a few drops of water disolves ?

Can you live knowing you were only an illusion ?

That you are an illusion ?

This is why enlightened people don't want
people to become enlightened.

Enlightenement is not something wished on
ones best friend, it is something wished
upon ones worst enemy.

All hopes and dreams are shattered.

One is left "hanging on the Gallows".

Logic does not work when talking to satsangis.

I had to do a study of hypnotism to find out
how to deal with people whom believed in crazy things.

It turns out you must talk to these people
by discussing their fear instead, without them realized you tactics.

Until you can get rid of their fear, there
is no possible way for them to discuss logic.

Tucson -- experienced something very similar so can esp. appreciate your description here. Thanks.

Mike Williams you wrote:

"Consciousness did not cause the universe,
it was an end product, or an effect
of evolution."

We can't neatly separate the universe known through the senses from the universe known through ostensibly trans-sensual experiences. In either case we are watery, electro-magnetic creatures who may not be in a position, logically speaking, to appreciate the whole enchilada.

Mike Williams also wrote above:

"The Guru capitalizes on these old hat
fabrics of ancient rhetoric to enhance

What if an alien handed me a 300,000 page mathematical formula that was the first of a billion 300,000 page documents explaining this whole thing euphemistically titled God? Could "i" relate to that? Who (me, glorified chimpanzee) is asking is more significant than the answer. We are barely above sniffing butts...albeit we like to imagine otherwise.

But even nothing is something....right?

Life is thoroughly a mystery. I'm convinced that science, nor philosophy, nor religion will ever figure it all out....and that's the way it should be. Of course, in the mean time, the never ending search is alot of fun. Who would want to do away with so much fun? Not I... ;-)

Mike Williams wrote: "We have identified our temporal consciousness with a Greater Consciousness. That greater Consciousness does not exist.:

--It seems to me our temporal consciousness is the greater consciousness and the other way around. Maybe we don't like the word consciousness. What is consciousness? Call it aliveness, energy, or whatever. It is being. Being is not a noun. It is a verb. It is a process, an effervescence that pulses in microsecond microbursts, ever unfolding, sizzling and percolating as life.

" But even nothing is something....right?"
quote Raven

That is correct. Our universe creates space as it expands. Only outside our universe is nothing.

Space is something tangible even when it is empty
to our eyes. The three laws apply to space.
electromagnetism, gravity and another force.

True emptiness only lies outside our expanding universe. It can never be experienced by us.

We are woven in the fabric of space, which is
something, not nothing.

Silence speaks...but "you" gotta learn to hear it! Once "you" hear silence like a roar your searchings and yearnings will simply be understood as playful activity full of sound and fury signifying nothing.

I like this.

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been posted. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.


Post a comment

Your Information

(Name is required. Email address will not be displayed with the comment.)


  • Welcome to the Church of the Churchless. If this is your first visit, click on "About this site--start here" in the Categories section below.
  • HinesSight
    Visit my other weblog, HinesSight, for a broader view of what's happening in the world of your Church unpastor, his wife, and dog.
  • BrianHines.com
    Take a look at my web site, which contains information about a subject of great interest to me: me.
  • Twitter with me
    Join Twitter and follow my tweets about whatever.
  • I Hate Church of the Churchless
    Can't stand this blog? Believe the guy behind it is an idiot? Rant away on our anti-site.