Post a comment
Your Information
(Name is required. Email address will not be displayed with the comment.)
« With religion and the Internet, be skeptical | Main | Religion related to social dysfunction »
You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.
As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.
Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.
Your Information
(Name is required. Email address will not be displayed with the comment.)
Brian
Can I request that you also adopt the "Challenge the message, not the messenger" policy and do not disrupt the thread because you suspect the messenger once used another name or broke the rules. An earlier thread erupted into a mass of flames because you chose to challenge the messenger rather than the message. So my request is that you too follow the same rules (and administer) that you set out for others. Can you do this please?
Posted by: Obscrene | September 14, 2009 at 11:21 PM
JAP/Obscrene, if you follow the commenting rules I've laid out, you'll have no problems on this blog. If you break the rules, your comments will be deleted or edited. Pretty simple.
Posted by: Blogger Brian | September 14, 2009 at 11:38 PM
[Using the powers of Almighty Blogger, Me, I shall allow one last comment by Obscrene to appear on this Holy Blog, as shown below, interpolating my own Divine Comments in between his Trollishness -- Blogger Brian]
For reasons unclear, Brian keeps deleting my comments, even though they fall well within his guidelines.
[No, they are not. This blog's guidelines prohibit troll'ish conduct: Commandment #6: "No trolling." The (semi) sentient being known as Obscrene has persisted in disrupting this blog, and by the powers vested in Me by Me, I have determined that he is deemed...Troll.]
It appears that Brian does not wish to abide by his own rules, wanting the freedom he is not prepared to allow others. Further, Brian does want to be able to delete contributors comments as and when he feels fit, for reasons he has no obligation to divulge.
[Wrong. I have divulged those reasons in this Very Holy Post, under the Supreme Commenting Policies:
http://hinessight.blogs.com/church_of_the_churchless/commenting-policies.html
But you are correct in one regard: I do have one freedom others do not. I administer this blog, and others do not. That's because I pay TypePad to host this blog, and I put considerable time and energy into providing a place in the blogosphere for the Churchless to worship spiritual independence. So, yes, I have the unique freedom to delete troll posts, and others that do not meet the commenting policies.]
While this is of course Brians right as blog owner, it completely contradicts the stated purpose of this blog, open debate.
[Strike two: Another wrong! Open debate is what trolls like Obscrene try to inhibit. Banning them produces a much more pleasant place to discuss substantive topics. Read all about their nefarious tactics:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Troll_(Internet)
http://www.flayme.com/troll/ ]
For those who do read this comment, do not expect it to be here for very long, I can almost guarantee that Brian will delete very soon
[Wrong again! Strike three. You're out!]
Cheers
Posted by: Obscrene | September 16, 2009 at 04:20 AM
Nice one Brian! thank God for sanity!.
Posted by: Andrew Loxham | September 24, 2009 at 07:32 AM