« Don’t obscure life with blind beliefs | Main | Conversing with a churchless Christian »

January 02, 2008


Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

You say:

"More accurately, those products of the human mind are real, but only in an extremely limited sense. They aren't lasting aspects of the natural world like trees, water, stars, frogs, and jellyfish are."

Any one product of the human mind will last longer than any given jellyfish: see hypnotism. Multiple products of the human mind are as real as all jellyfish will be, given time: see carbon poisoning.

"Real in a limited sense" is hedging - either all thought, sense and emotion is illusory, or the causal connection between the interior human world and the exterior natural world grounds mental processes in reality. Not simply "it is real because I think it, cogito ergo sum", but "this spinach gives my brain the calcium required to think my hand into picking that carrot."

Do you want to continue the fallacy that thousands of years of organized religion has imposed on human behavior? The spiritual world is not separate from the material world, (and please, all of you metaphysical geniuses, read that line with some sense of metaphor.)

Edward, you make good sense. When I wrote this post last night, I had a glimmer of the thoughts you're expressing. But as bright as I am, I didn't follow the glimmer along your path.

I agree with you. And I don't. There's something right about what you said, and also something wrong.

When I can figure out the difference between the two -- agreement and disagreement, right and wrong -- I guess I'll be somewhere. Where, I don't know, but somewhere different than where I am now.

It just seems that I, like everyone, can think up so much crap that vanishes like a wisp. Then there's nature, which seems to have a lot more substance than all that crap.

Yes, poison oak is crappy. Mosquitoes too. But their crap reality somehow sees to be of a different order than my mind's carp reality.

And yet, there's also no difference, like you say. My crappy thoughts and feelings sprout from bodily energy that comes from food that comes from the sun that comes from the laws of nature.

So, sure, it's all natural. Supernatural beliefs also.

Hey Brian, nice to hear that you came onboard as a Bright!... for whatever its worth. Bright-on Bro!

And I bet you feel as I do that it's about time those of us who have a much more naturalistic world-view and no longer buy into all of the supernatural and mystical hype get to have a voice and are heard, and hopefully stop getting marginalized by others who are so insecure that they find it necessary to cling to supernatural and mystical beliefs.

What's the difference between an atheist and a bright?


I might have this right, or somebody can set me straight:

An atheist denies the existence of a God or Diety.

I don't think Brights completely deny the possibility of the existence of God, but rather seek to acknowledge what is apparent or can be known via normal perception of the natural world instead of that which cannot.

Perhaps God isn't perceived because it is a functioning rather than a thing that functions. God is universing, that is, it is being the universe, but as what God is, it is not anything objectifiable that can be known.

> So would the existence of a higher
> dimension beyond the three of space and
> one of time that we're familiar with be
> natural, or supernatural?

I use the word "nature" to mean the substance of everything. Like water is the "nature" of a lake. So there's no question of anything being "higher-" or "super-" to nature.

It seems that some people use "nature" to means "what I understand" and "supernatural" to mean everything else. This seems less clear than just talking about "known" and "unknown."

The key questions of life (What am I? Why do I live in this world?) are unknown, so we can make peace with that, and decide for ourselves what direction adopt.


can that web site be printed on soft paper?
I'll keep next to the toilet with my other books of profound insight.

"Not how the world is, is the mystical, but that it is" - Wittgenstein


Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been posted. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.


Post a comment

Your Information

(Name is required. Email address will not be displayed with the comment.)


  • Welcome to the Church of the Churchless. If this is your first visit, click on "About this site--start here" in the Categories section below.
  • HinesSight
    Visit my other weblog, HinesSight, for a broader view of what's happening in the world of your Church unpastor, his wife, and dog.
  • BrianHines.com
    Take a look at my web site, which contains information about a subject of great interest to me: me.
  • Twitter with me
    Join Twitter and follow my tweets about whatever.
  • I Hate Church of the Churchless
    Can't stand this blog? Believe the guy behind it is an idiot? Rant away on our anti-site.