« Intelligent design believers settle for second-rate God | Main | Possible and impossible gods »

August 12, 2006


Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

Interesting post, I'm a bit curious to see Stenger's book now too.

I came here via Technorati and I have an ulterior motive - I'm starting a philosophy blog war (starting with some members of my study group) but I thought it would be much more interesting to have external participants. If you have any inclinations whatsoever towards that sort of thing you can find information about it at the url I gave for this comment.

Brian wrote:

"After thousands of years of people meditating, contemplating, praying, and otherwise searching for some demonstrable sign of God’s presence, the result is total absence."

I beg to differ. There are thousands of years of demonsratable proof. Please visit the The Salvia Divinorum Research and Information Center, and other related links:





::All we have are subjective claims, not objective facts:::

Great point.
I wonder if is possible for my subjective self to truly witness objective facts. What would it take to convince the subjective me that God exists, and is there a capacity for the subjective to understand?
It is a bleak thought to think that something as simple as 'capacity' might determine spiritual understanding.

We have poked and prodded and twisted and written: there is no objective evidence of emotion. All we can objectively prove is that there is action.

We have a world just as it would be without emotion. Storms still happen, the ocean rises and falls, no effect of worry, anger, happiness or sorrow can be seen. All we see is the result of cold, logical calculated action.

Science could prove there was no emotion if it wanted to; but science is pouting.

"Such is the ageless message of great mystics. And it is entirely compatible with the message of the new physics. There’s no God out there. Perhaps, though, there is in here."

There is no "out there" either, nor an "in here". No self, no other. No past and no future Just an undivided wholeness in the Now dreaming of past and future, separation, suffering, and sin. I like how Sting describes this:

"Sooner or later, just like the world first day, sooner or later we learn to throw the past away. History will teach us nothing. Know your human rights, be what you come here for."

This scientific research closely tallies with Advaita Vedanta. I find Advaita more plausible as it says that the Void(Brahman in Advaita) is the ocean of Consciousness from which various thoughts(maya) emerge.
God is Brahman+Maya. When we try to understand Brahman through our thought, the result is that we see it as a form/voice. This also explains the existance of so many different descriptions of God as the thoughts are different.
I'd request my fellow churchless companions to check Advaita. Your responses are welcome.

Om Namah Shivay

Yes. Vic Stenger has no idea that his view is consistent with the advaita view. I did try to mention it to him, but temperamental opinions and entrrnched dogma prevented any thoughtfulness.

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been posted. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.


Post a comment

Your Information

(Name is required. Email address will not be displayed with the comment.)


  • Welcome to the Church of the Churchless. If this is your first visit, click on "About this site--start here" in the Categories section below.
  • HinesSight
    Visit my other weblog, HinesSight, for a broader view of what's happening in the world of your Church unpastor, his wife, and dog.
  • BrianHines.com
    Take a look at my web site, which contains information about a subject of great interest to me: me.
  • Twitter with me
    Join Twitter and follow my tweets about whatever.
  • I Hate Church of the Churchless
    Can't stand this blog? Believe the guy behind it is an idiot? Rant away on our anti-site.