« Spiritual emptiness: it’s a good thing | Main | Hitting all my conversational buttons »

March 10, 2006

Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

Brian,

Sorry to hear about your disappointment. It’s unfortunate that even a congregation of free thinkers, when grouped together, tends to draw toward commonalities. Then it seems inevitable that the “believers” segregate themselves from the non-believers. I suspect it’s just part of our tribal human nature.

I don’t know much about Universism, but it’s always a let down when you invest yourself into a group then it goes an unexpected direction.

Hinesism sounds like a worthy pursuit. My own branch of Smithism is doing well – I’d invite you to attend, but I can’t risk tainting the sanctity of Smithism with the presence of any Hinesist infidels. Sorry, nothing personal.

Michael (grand poo-bah of Smithism)

Michael, I appreciate your commiseration. I'm not losing much, if anything, by renouncing my Universistness though.

Mainly, I'll be losing the "joy" of going through the trouble of reserving room at a Salem coffee house for a meeting, announcing this to the 23 members of the group, and then finding that only one or two people show up.
(Does this sound like any of your campaign rallies?)

No offense taken to your wanting to keep Smithism for yourself. Makes perfect sense. Myself, I find that my divinity is more highly realized when I'm entirely occupied within my own mind.

For example, I'll be happily musing, "I am the master of my realm, the Alpha of all Alphas, not even close to Omega." Then I'll hear my wife yelling, "Are you ever going to get away from that damn computer and install the weatherstripping that's been sitting by the front door for weeks?!"

"Yes, dear. Coming." She is not yet (nor, sadly, ever will be) an obedient devotee of Hinesism. Unless it be her own variety, since we share a last name.

In computer games like Myst or Time Traveler, the player needs to move through scenes and solve puzzles. This often entails discovering "hotspots" in the program, and clicking on a graphic representation of a device, a button, a loose rock on a wall. Often, the player becomes frustrated by the puzzle, a will begin clicking all objects in the visual field, in the hopes of finding a clue, or opening a secret door. In my house, we call this "bad art," because it is only background and not a "hotspot."

Sounds like you ran into some bad art. The puzzle is somewhere else.

you know brian, i don't read this site much because i'm pretty stupid but, you've been sounding weird.

truth is pathless, you sound like a guy who could get a little something out of krishnamurti thinking.

"The core of Krishnamurti's teaching is contained in the statement he made in 1929 when he said: 'Truth is a pathless land'. Man cannot come to it through any organization, through any creed, through any dogma, priest or ritual, not through any philosophic knowledge or psychological technique. He has to find it through the mirror of relationship, through the understanding of the contents of his own mind, through observation and not through intellectual analysis or introspective dissection. Man has built in himself images as a fence of security - religious, political, personal. These manifest as symbols, ideas, beliefs. The burden of these images dominates man's thinking, his relationships and his daily life. These images are the causes of our problems for they divide man from man. His perception of life is shaped by the concepts already established in his mind. The content of his consciousness is his entire existence. This content is common to all humanity. The individuality is the name, the form and superficial culture he acquires from tradition and environment. The uniqueness of man does not lie in the superficial but in complete freedom from the content of his consciousness, which is common to all mankind. So he is not an individual."

some link i found...

justanidiot

Couldn't agree with you more, justanidiot, I have been sounding weird lately. What's even weirder is that when I write something, I consciously try to tone down the weirdness that I'm aware of inside myself. So the situation with me is even weirder than it appears. Weird.

I've read some of Krishnamurti. I've read some of almost everybody. I like what he says, but his style and tone didn't resonate much with me. I got the feeling that this is a guy who can talk a good metaphysical game but hasn't really been able to play it.

Of course, I could be wrong. I have no idea what Krishnamurti was like, deep down. I just know that when I read some writings I feel a tingle of "Oh yeah, that's it!" and when I read other writings I don't. Krishmaturti's book was in the last category.

No offense but from what I understand you've quit your religion more because there was a controversy, and less because one side or the other was necessarily right. Were you expecting that no one would ever oppose it?

Ends, you've got it backward. I don't mind controversy. But I do mind a religion (or anyone else) trying to stifle controversy by shutting off debate and acting imperiously. And that seems to be what the Universist Movement did.

For a "religion" that prides itself on supposedly being non-dogmatic and open, this was just too much hypocrisy for me. I expect some hypocrisy from any person or group, because none of us can be consistent all of the time.

However, given that a core value of Universism is free discussion, the Movement and Ford Vox should have welcomed criticism. Deleting the critical comments was an indication that the Universist Movement has become as orthodox as the traditional religions it protests.

I've always been leery of Universism for pretty much the same reason. It's not that they stifle controversy, but that they dogmatically assert how things CAN'T be done. Ends up being precisely the same thing as saying restrictively how it CAN ONLY be done...

Brian,

Unfortunately you simply joined the wrong religion. So the next time you get the urge to join something, why not try my own favorite: Its called "ITYS" (I Told You So). However, we currently only have space for two members: I and You. And since I have already joined, the "I" membership is already taken. But the "You" membership is still available. The benefit is that as soon as you join, you will be eligible to start another branch of your own as an "I". This is a very well established religion with a long and illustrious history. We also include a life-time guanantee that "WE told you so".

I just happened by this blog, (It's pretty good!) and the situation you're describing in Universism sounds a lot like a term I remember from college history class: "the Thermidor Reaction."

For anyone who doesn't know about it, the Thermidor Reaction is what often (usually) happens when a despotic regime is overthrown and is replaced by a "kinder, gentler" regime: the "kinder, gentler" regime soon takes on the same (or similar) despotic characteristics as the original (and despised) regime it overthrew!

Maybe the Thermidor Reaction was at work in Ford Vox and his movement when they tried to overthrow the oppresive regime of "faith-based" religion. "We found the enemy, and it is 'us.'"

"Us" or "ego" anyway…

Just a thought.

Well, it looks like you jumped the Universism ship, none too soon. You see, it just sank.

Universism is dead. It was killed by its founder after setting up a new president. The site is down and the word given is that private individuals will get together and strangers are not allowed (my comment).

Some have suggested that organizations have spats and get over them. But you see . . . .. Universism was becoming publically known. CNN, LA Times, Anderson360, and more reviewed and interviewed head people. Now its all gone. NEVERMIND! : -) Its posters of the forum have gone elsewhere.

So, even if it is stared up again, it would be just a shell of its former self, ready to be deflated on a moments notice just like before. Now you may not like the catholic church, you may even hate it, but would you think it would just go away cause the Pope got pissed off one day???? : -)

So, a moments silence, please. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..
It was a good thought, an interesting idea, but its gone. Too bad. :-(

Elder Norm

FWIW, a lot of the other jumped-ship-Universists have congregated at the Freethought Fellowship:

http://freethought-fellowship.org/forums/

I'm glad to see that I'm not the only one. I left Universism about a year ago for the same reasons - it had become less "freethought" than an ever constricted idea of what "freethought" is. Kind of sad, but I guess it was ineveitable.

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Working...
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been saved. Comments are moderated and will not appear until approved by the author. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

Working...

Post a comment

Comments are moderated, and will not appear until the author has approved them.

Your Information

(Name is required. Email address will not be displayed with the comment.)

Welcome


  • Welcome to the Church of the Churchless. If this is your first visit, click on "About this site--start here" in the Categories section below.
  • HinesSight
    Visit my other weblog, HinesSight, for a broader view of what's happening in the world of your Church unpastor, his wife, and dog.
  • BrianHines.com
    Take a look at my web site, which contains information about a subject of great interest to me: me.
  • Twitter with me
    Join Twitter and follow my tweets about whatever.
  • I Hate Church of the Churchless
    Can't stand this blog? Believe the guy behind it is an idiot? Rant away on our anti-site.