« German translation reflects my transformation | Main | Wu or Mu? I talk with a cow fancier. »

February 26, 2006

Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

" O scholars, you are mistaken; there's no creator or creation there.

There's no radiant form, no time, no word, no flesh, or faith;no
cause or effect, or even a thought of the Vedas.

There's no Hari or Brahma, no Shiva or Shakti, no pilgrinages or
rituals;

There is no mother, no father, no Guru; think! Is it two or is it
One?

Kabir says: if you understand this, you are the teacher and I am the
disciple.

There, what form or shape is there to describe? What second,
what 'other', is there to see?

In the beginning, there is no Aum, or Veda. Who can trace His birth?

There, no sky exists, no moon or sun; no father's seed, no air, fire,
water or earth.

Who can name Him, or know His will?

Who can say from whence He comes?

Remembering the Void, the simple One, a light bursts forth;

I offer myself to that Existance who is non-existance."

Kabir Sahib - Bijak, Shastri, p 42-43

I tried to leave a Wu comment, but your system won't allow it. So, here's something in place of my nothing.

.

You're right about TypePad's insistence on something rather than nothing, Rambling Taoist. The preceding was the best I could do myself.

And for sure it's the wisest thing I'll write or say all day.

So, how did you accomplished the above nothingness?

Ah, Rambling Taoist, sometimes apparent nothingness is not true nothingness. In the midst of nothing there is something. Otherwise, how would we know the difference between nothing and something?

...Woo Woo...(sound of a train a'comin)...Woo Woo...

But does the panther have Buddha-nature?

Im sorry to say its impossible to reach your goal of nothingness. However, I can guarentee you will reach a distributed unconsciousness state. ;p

love the wu. to paraphrase Umberto Eco (in Foucault's Pendulum): the true initiate cannot be coerced in to giving up the secret, no enemy can torture it from him, no jealous rival can coax it from him, because the true initiate knows that there is no secret

and modern neuroscience seems to say that self is an illusion

love the wu--I am nobody

Just a silly doubt.
Does Ric Flair practice Woo...????

Wu...

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Working...
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been saved. Comments are moderated and will not appear until approved by the author. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

Working...

Post a comment

Comments are moderated, and will not appear until the author has approved them.

Your Information

(Name is required. Email address will not be displayed with the comment.)

Welcome


  • Welcome to the Church of the Churchless. If this is your first visit, click on "About this site--start here" in the Categories section below.
  • HinesSight
    Visit my other weblog, HinesSight, for a broader view of what's happening in the world of your Church unpastor, his wife, and dog.
  • BrianHines.com
    Take a look at my web site, which contains information about a subject of great interest to me: me.
  • Twitter with me
    Join Twitter and follow my tweets about whatever.
  • I Hate Church of the Churchless
    Can't stand this blog? Believe the guy behind it is an idiot? Rant away on our anti-site.