« Killing coyotes isn't necessary. Our neighbors are wrong. | Main | Metolius editorial in Oregonian wrong again »

March 24, 2009

Comments

I feel your pain, Brian.
I'm sick of the cold and rain also.
I just picked up 330 gallons of syrup to feed the bees (because of $#!ttY weather) and have 55 queens in a queen bank.
No time for uselessness.
I gain much pleasure from a meaningful, useful life.
Maybe you are stuck in the rut I once suffered: usefulness was weather dependant.
That REALLY SUCKS!
It all gets down to planning.
If you are a one man band like I am, you have to plan in layers.
Tomorrow, next week, next month, etc.
HOWEVER, the plans are mearly an outline.
I have learned from you, and am very grateful for the lesson about NO OVERLAYS for a given day or activity. That lesson has had real meaning in my life!
Spring is upon us!
:-)

Interesting on Paris. I have noticed (not scientifically determined) that the highest number of my google searches have come from pack rats and praying mantises. Is there a connection?

I have generally found "followers" and "following" to be difficult to explain or internalize.

But if you just change the verb to "listen", all is better. You have "listeners" and you are "listening"...

Kari, good point. I like "listening." Of course, with the @ (reply) feature, which I tried out for the first time this morning, a listener can become a talker.

For some reason, a yin-yang counterpoint to my verbosity, probably, I really like typing tweets with one finger on my iPhone, keeping a thought short and simple.

And not worrying about whether I'm pushing a profundity out into cyberspace. Spouting inanities can be relaxing, so long as people can choose whether to be on the receiving end of the downpour.

I adamantly refuse to twitter or tweet or whatever it's called. Probably due to some anarchist leanings. I'm generally long-winded and the thought of having to limit myself to no more than 140 characters is terrifying. What if I had an astute point to make but I couldn't make it in any less than 141 characters? Besides, who arbitrarily settle on 140? Why not 78, 6.93 or 4 zillion?

I've been told that 140 characters is the max allowed in text messages. But this doesn't answer the "why 140?" question.

I'm using Twitter as a sort of verbosity diet. It's interesting (and tough) for me to say something so briefly. You're right: sometimes I get to the end of a tweet and find that I'm a few characters over my Twitter budget.

I edit a bit, press "send," and have a warm feeling of succinctness.

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Working...
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been posted. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

Working...

Post a comment

Your Information

(Name is required. Email address will not be displayed with the comment.)

Strange Up Salem

Welcome to HinesSight

  • Salem Political Snark
    My local political rants are now made on this badass blog. Check it out. Dirty politics, outrageous actions, sleaze, backroom deals — we’re on it. 

  • Twitter with me
    Join Twitter and follow my tweets about whatever.
  • Church of the Churchless
    Visit my other weblog, Church of the Churchless, where the gospel of spiritual independence is preached.

  • Welcome to HinesSight. If this is your first visit, click on "About this site--start here" in the Categories section below.
Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...