« A desire for something, infinity, doesn't prove it exists | Main | I'm asked about my RSSB meditation experience »

July 18, 2014

Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

Woaw! Talk about a healthy dose of blog catharsis... right on Dude!

"Believing" in golf, rap, and eating meat seems rather absurd since these are activities that do exist in our reality(ies)- objective reality, hence making it possible to also exist in our subjective reality (when we fantasize about 'hitting a hole in one', with the models featured in 50 cent's latest mvs cheering on, and then hosting a barbecue after).
However, 'believing in God' does seem to make a tad bit more sense...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cO7mfoD_edU

Under the Supreme Court ruling corporations/businesses are still going to have to provide 16 of the 20 birth control drugs that are available. The other 4 drugs in question terminate an already fertilized egg...in other words, abortion drugs. Those are the drugs under the Supreme Court ruling that certain private companies will not have to provide due to their religious beliefs.

It seems reasonable to me that those who believe in abortion should allow those who do not believe in abortion to do so especially in a privately run company.

That abortion is OK is a belief.
That abortion is not OK is also a belief.

If someone does not like a private company's policies based on religious beliefs they can work somewhere else.

tucson, those four drugs don't cause an abortion. Medical experts have said that Hobby Lobby and the Supreme Court are wrong about this.
http://www.latimes.com/local/abcarian/la-me-ra-craziest-thing-about-hobby-lobby-20140630-column.html

Unfortunately, the Court went along with the notion that I criticize here: a deeply held religious belief is what counts, not whether the belief is true. This is ridiculous. Laws are meant to apply to everybody, regardless of someone's beliefs.

Brian, I'm not one for doing much research and homework which probably explains why my formal education ended in the tenth grade, a badge of honor I cherish deeply. Having a surfing beach and beach babes only a mile from one of my high schools didn't help either because I often turned left towards the beach as if drawn by a magnet instead of going straight into the school.

Anyway, I girded up my loins and did a little search enginning and found articles stating that the four drugs in question, Plan B, Ella, ParaGard (copper IUD) and Mirena are all considered by at least some doctors/ObGyns/researchers to be abortifacients (they induce abortions), especially Plan B and Ella.

So, the opinion stated by the doctor in the article you presented is just that, an opinion among differing opinions.

Although the data is not conclusive, it appears there is enough evidence to lead medical professionals as well as the Hobby Lobby folks to reasonably consider them to be abortion drugs.

So, should Hobby Lobby be forced to provide abortion drugs to their employees if they don't want to? I don't think so.

I agree with you that laws should not be based on religious beliefs but rather secular ethical and practical considerations. Hobby Lobby could just say they think abortion is wrong and don't want to support it and leave it at that.

it appears there is enough evidence to lead medical professionals as well as the Hobby Lobby folks to reasonably consider them to be abortion drugs.

If this is what you got from the article, you don't know how to read. Not only is there no mention of "some doctors" who believe these drugs cause abortions, but it quotes a statement from The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists saying that the drugs are "contraceptives, not aboritfacients". They do not cause abortions.

What makes this Supreme Court decision such an awful one is that it gives greater value to the ignorant opinion, i.e., the belief that these drugs cause abortions than it gives to scientific fact.

I think that the Supreme Court's decision was the fairest way to placate the most cry babies.

When life begins is simply conjecture, whether it is informed scientific consensus or dearly held belief. Because it really doesn't matter. At all.

Pregnancy occurs when a fertilized egg gets implanted in the uterine wall. This is the scientific consensus opinion (sic). Ergo - any process or agent employed to prevent implantation of a fertilized egg is a contraceptive. No definable process has begun to occur.

Religious people are of the opinion that the definable process of pregnancy occurs when the egg becomes fertilized, and that, therefore, an abortion has occurred; abortion being the forced cessation of a process that has known consequences.

Women who use birth control do not want to become pregnant. You probably will not get much of an argument from chemists who formulate "contraceptives" that the main goal of chemical contraception is prevention of implantation of a fertilized egg in the uterine wall. Why dick around trying to prevent a vast army of spermatozoa from reaching an egg when preventing the egg from becoming implanted is much easier, especially on the woman's physiology?

So - our wise Supreme Court justices capitulated somewhat to the religious cry babies who can't tolerate the notion that a woman can achieve near-100 percent surety that she will not get pregnant in spite of the fact that she likes to fuck.

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Working...
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been saved. Comments are moderated and will not appear until approved by the author. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

Working...

Post a comment

Comments are moderated, and will not appear until the author has approved them.

Welcome


  • Welcome to the Church of the Churchless. If this is your first visit, click on "About this site--start here" in the Categories section below.
  • HinesSight
    Visit my other weblog, HinesSight, for a broader view of what's happening in the world of your Church unpastor, his wife, and dog.
  • BrianHines.com
    Take a look at my web site, which contains information about a subject of great interest to me: me.
  • Twitter with me
    Join Twitter and follow my tweets about whatever.
  • I Hate Church of the Churchless
    Can't stand this blog? Believe the guy behind it is an idiot? Rant away on our anti-site.

Posts compendium

Teeny-tiny Collection Plate

  • Brian Hines: Return to the One

    Brian Hines: Return to the One
    If you'd like to support the Church's efforts in a small way, and also learn about a great Greek mystic philosopher (Plotinus) who wonderfully embodies our creedless creed, consider buying our unpastor's book, "Return to the One: Plotinus's Guide to God-Realization."

Blog powered by Typepad

Become a Fan

Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...