« Einstein talks about "spirit." But not in a religious sense. | Main | "Let It Go." Great song. Great lyrics. Inspiring. »

January 27, 2014

Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

Blogger Brian - I am sure that you are aware of David Chapman's blog at WordPress, where he has recently held forth on the the subject of the naturalization of Tantric Buddhism, and the four strategies he outlines concerning the elimination of supernatural elements germane to Buddhism as a whole: ignoring, denial, psychologizing, and mythologizing. (By the way - thank you for making me aware of David Chapman via your Churchless blog)

In 1968, at the tender age of 19, and as a "lapsed" Catholic, I dropped acid for the first of dozens of times. I had no knowledge of Near or Far Eastern culture at that time. Zero. Nada. But when I closed my eyes about 45 minutes after ingesting what was alleged to be LSD-25 (effectively segregating the LSD-25 molecule from kissing cousins such as strychnine was beyond the capabilities of most underground chemists) my visual cortex was overwhelmed with fractal patterns, kaleidoscopic colors and movements that for all the world seemed akin to Persian arabesques and Tibetan sand mandalas - intense, complex, and.....I must admit - without any rational relevance. But it was there. Was this information, or noise? If information, what was being conveyed? What purpose could noise serve, except as information of a sort? Capitulation of the imagined entity will always be a requirement if Reality is to be discerned - the glaring impotence of the human ego is the "hintergedanke" that inhabits the brain of even the most stalwart of materialists.
The Penrose-Hameroff theory of consciousness known as Orch OR is both denied and ignored (two of Chapman's 4 strategies for the "naturalization" of certain Buddhisms) because reductionists claim that quantum mechanics is not relevant at scales of time and distance relevant to biology. Hameroff postulates that consciousness is an intrinsic characteristic of whatever "reality" is at the quantum level, rather that simply the result of the complex computational abilities of the brain.

So ---- either consciousness is an epiphenomenon of the brain, or the brain is an epiphenomenon of the collapse of quantum superposition. (Theoretical physicists are becoming increasingly vocal about how absurd are the various misunderstandings of quantum mechanics that are extant these days - I am nowhere near qualified to say anything at all about quantum theory - but the reader probably knows what I am trying to say - through the optic of their own misunderstanding).

In any case, it should be more obvious than a punch in the nose that consciousness (whatever that is) can never be demonstrated without a vehicle of expression (like physicality). Conversely, physicality can never be demonstrated without consciousness.

And, it does not matter to "what is". So enjoy yourselves - if you can.

Hello Brian, Radhasoami. How are you?

“Unaccomplished activities of past lives are also one of the causes for reincarnation. Some of us reincarnate to complete the unfinished tasks of previous birth. The is evident from my own story of reincarnation:
“My most Revered Guru of my previous life His Holiness Maharaj Sahab, 3rd Spiritual Head of Radhasoami Faith had revealed this secret to me during trance like state of mine. This was sort of REVELATION.
HE told me, “Tum Sarkar Sahab Ho” (You are Sarkar Sahab). Sarkar Sahab was one of the most beloved disciple of His Holiness Maharj Sahab. Sarkar Sahab later on became Fourth of Spiritual Head Radhasoami Faith.
Since I don’t have any direct realization of it so I can not claim the extent of its correctness. But it seems to be correct. During my previous birth I wanted to sing the song of ‘Infinite’ (Agam Geet yeh gawan chahoon tumhri mauj nihara, mauj hoi to satguru soami karoon supanth vichara) but I could not do so then since I had to leave the mortal frame at a very early age. But through the unbounded Grace and Mercy of my most Revered Guru that desire of my past birth is being fulfilled now.”
I am one the chief expounder and supporter of Gravitation Force Theory of God. This is most scientific and secular theory of God. This is the Theory of Universal Religion. I have given Higher Theory of Everything. Sometimes back I posted this as comments to a blog on:
‘Fighting of the Cause of Allah by Governing a Smart Mathematics Based on Islamic Teology’
By Rohedi of Rohedi Laboratories, Indonesia. Rohedi termed my higher theory of everything more wonderful than which has been developed by Stephen Hawking. Some details are quoted below:
rohedi
@anirudh kumar satsangi
Congratulation you have develop the higher theory of everything more wonderful than which has been developed by Stephen Hawking. Hopefully your some views for being considered for Unified Field Theory are recognized by International Science Community, hence I soon read the fundamental aspect proposed by you.
I have posted my comments to the Blog of Syed K. Mirza on Evolutionary Science vs. Creation Theory, and Intellectual Hypocrisy. Syed Mirza seems to be a very liberal muslim. He responded to my comments as mentioned below.
“Many thanks for your very high thought explanations of God.
You said:
“Hence it can be assumed that the Current of Chaitanya (Consciousness) and Gravitational Wave are the two names of the same Supreme Essence (Seed) which has brought forth the entire creation. Hence it can be assumed that the source of current of consciousness and gravitational wave is the same i.e. God or ultimate creator.
(i) Gravitation Force is the Ultimate Creator, Source of Gravitational Wave is God”
Whatever you call it, God is no living God of any religion. Yes, when I call it “Mother Nature” is the God generated from all Natural forces and Gravitational force is the nucleus of all forces or we can presume that Gravitation is the ultimate guiding principle of this Mother Nature we call it non-living God unlike living personal God of religions. I can not believe any personal God would do so much misery created for its creation. Hence, only non-living natural God can explain everything in the Universe. When we think of any living personal God, things do not ad up!”
I have also discovered the mathematical expression for emotional quotient (E.Q.) and for spiritual quotient (S.Q.).
Austrian Scientist Rudolf Steiner says,
“Just as an age was once ready to receive the Copernican theory of the universe, so is our age ready for the idea of reincarnation to be brought into the general consciousness of humanity”.

Once I was told by a satsangi that in my past life I was a goat-herder that was murdered. This satsangi had descended into apparent madness, and became homeless telling others he was a realized master and me the above. I heard a rumor that he had committed suicide. He had an estranged wife and two children.

Another well-known psychic, Kevin Ryerson, in the voice of a disembodied Irishman channeled by Ryerson, told me I was a dark-skinned maker of golden masks in ancient Egypt and in another life was some kind of merchant that opened trade routes in partnership with my current wife who was a male in that life. He didn't tell me if I was gay or not.

I was told by another psychic I was a Buddhist monk in a past life. Ho hum. Rather boring. Doesn't everyone hear that one?

They could have told me anything and who could or could not refute them?

The only lifetimes I have even the slightest recollection of is one where I was a rather horny and slutty princess during the Renaissance, a North American Indian in the Southwest, and another as an organ grinder's monkey.

@Anirudh kumar, you have discovered the mathematical expression for emotional quotient (E.Q.) and for spiritual quotient (S.Q.).?? And you are the chief expounder and supporter of Gravitation Force Theory of God??

Dont want to be rude, but are you sure you are not going through some sort of mania? Lot of satsangis do get confused between Maniac episode and spiritual awakening. Do get yourself checked brother!

Great Stuff! You've given a lot to think about...Thank You!

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Working...
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been saved. Comments are moderated and will not appear until approved by the author. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

Working...

Post a comment

Comments are moderated, and will not appear until the author has approved them.

Welcome


  • Welcome to the Church of the Churchless. If this is your first visit, click on "About this site--start here" in the Categories section below.
  • HinesSight
    Visit my other weblog, HinesSight, for a broader view of what's happening in the world of your Church unpastor, his wife, and dog.
  • BrianHines.com
    Take a look at my web site, which contains information about a subject of great interest to me: me.
  • Twitter with me
    Join Twitter and follow my tweets about whatever.
  • I Hate Church of the Churchless
    Can't stand this blog? Believe the guy behind it is an idiot? Rant away on our anti-site.

Posts compendium

Teeny-tiny Collection Plate

  • Brian Hines: Return to the One

    Brian Hines: Return to the One
    If you'd like to support the Church's efforts in a small way, and also learn about a great Greek mystic philosopher (Plotinus) who wonderfully embodies our creedless creed, consider buying our unpastor's book, "Return to the One: Plotinus's Guide to God-Realization."

Blog powered by Typepad

Become a Fan

Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...