« Life is change. Why cling to a religion? | Main | Spiritual experiences don't exist »

March 19, 2009

Comments

Brian, thank-you for your wise and inspiring posts and particularly this one!

Interesting how Eastern fundamentalism rejects intellectualism and how a fundamentalist caught up in a master- disciple relationship struggles to see relationships outside of these boundaries.

I have also noticed that where people would naturally feel compassion,the response instead could easily fall into the learned, cruel and robotic.

Thanks Brian that is a very nice post. Very clear and it makes a lot of sense. However, in my opinion we need to take care great care in how we handle a fundamentalist. Let me explain.

Fundamentalist are inherently very weak people. Hard on the outside, but weak on the inside is the way I like to think about them. In my experience I have found that some people apparently somehow need to be fundamentalist in order to maintain their mental balance.

During my lifetime (70 years) I have known two people who were saved from drugs by becoming a fundamentalist. Then they had gone on for many years leading a useful and productive life as happy drug free fundamentalist until one day they were talked out of their fundamental religious beliefs. Then, apparently because of their mental ability or view or something that I do not fully understand they could not cope with their life without the foothold of their fundamentalism. Thus they reverted back to drugs and totally destroyed their life and made their friends and family miserable in the process.

This is the reason that I generally avoid serious discussions with fundamentalist. Once you break down the hard outer shell and get them to listen to you they could just collapse. Not all, not many, but in at least 2 cases that I know of this did happen.

Do you have any wise thoughts on this?

Catherine... yes, its annoying and fake'y to see someone desperately trying to appear humble and virtuous. Like you said, this is a contradiction in many Eastern traditions.

They claim to be non-intellectual, yet the essence of intellectuality is duality and separation -- not simply being, acting, or thinking, but also having an awareness of the self being, acting, or thinking.

When people are afraid of behaving naturally and spontaneously, worried that they'll do the wrong thing or transgress some commandment, that's when the robotic side of spirituality becomes evident.

Turnertoons, I don't know about "wise," but I've always got thoughts. Sure, I can see that fundamentalism can help people cope with life. 12 Step programs basically are fundamentalist. When you're stumbling and about to fall on your face, any sort of support you can hang on to can be helpful.

The difference is that I've never had a recovering alcoholic or drug addict come up to me and proselytize, or try to force their views on me. They seem to be focused on curing their own addictions, not on saving other people from theirs.

This relates to my observation that religiosity, even of the fundamentalist variety, isn't objectionable to me when believers simply express their faith sincerely, humbly, personally. It's like someone saying "I just love this song!" I may not like it, but their enthusiasm is enjoyable. Passion is what makes the world go round (along with gravity).

We all have crutches of one sort or another. It's only when someone wants to beat me over the head with his or her crutch that fundamentalist support structures become a problem.

Brian, this a mighty good article. In fact it addresses the issue so well, that I many times wish I could assembled and make copies of this current article, and several others that you've posted here over the years that deal with fundamentalism and RS fundamentalism in particular... and then print them all out in neat little pamplets and give one each to some very narrow-minded super-judgemental die-hard RS satsangis in my local area. And since you wrote them, you could probably locate and assemble most of the appropritate articles easier than I can.

In any case, I feel much the same way you do: I don't have any problem at all with people choosing and practicing the RS path. Thats their business. Its when they start getting judgemental and critical and authoritarian, and very uptight and unfriendly towards me, that I fight back.

I'd like to be able to give those types something to read and consider that would help them to reflect upon their own very fundamentalist outlook and attitude, and their own insecurity that is at the bottom of it.

When people like them are entrenched in a spiritual cult like RS, they never get exposed to any outside clear, open, and non-fundmentalist thinking. In RS, just as other in other religuous fundamentalism, they can't see the forest for the trees.

But make no mistake, I have no desire to change them.... only just to expose them to a more open rational non-dogmatic point of view, a clearer more objective way of thinking. The choice is always theirs anyway, yet if only they had a broader perspective.

I see a whole lot of churchless fundamentalists over here thinking they less fundamental than all the other fundamentalists on the planet, when in fact they far more full of themselves than possibly all the bigoted authoritarian religions put together.

ain't it just a hoot watching all these holier than thou enlightened ego strokers thinking they got it off pat and looking down their dainty egocentric noses at the rest of humanity.

Something tells me most of these two bit chicken run dandy's in here are actually just second grade lily livered snotty types that think a whole lot far too much of themselves to be any good to anybody let alone themselves.

Ashy,
If you are so right and wise, then why don't you tell us about yourself a little? If you are not stuck-up like you say that we are, then why don't you tell us more about your own experience and point of view, about where you are from and what your spiritual background and history is?

Why don't you participate and converse with us, instead of just throwing darts in a hit and run fashion. That sort of thing does not win any arguments.

I think that most all of us here are open-minded and would really like you to share your own story. So why not join the conversation and discussion? Thats all we are doing here - asking questions and discussing. I think Brian asked you to share too. So how about it? I am interested in hearing what you have to say. Thank you.


Now thats a far better approach towards a little humble introspective truth seeking than most the other spewed arrogance that gets chucked around from pillar to post around these parts, maybe you getting somewhere after all. Keep it up. There might still be some hope for you yet after all is said and done.

Takes a big man to recognize his own fallacy.

One little secret, see if you can go with it.

Its all about love... nothing else whatsoever.

ashy, read your previous comment -- just above -- and tell me if you really believe that it reflects your "its all about love" philosophy. I'll quote some from what you said:

"ain't it just a hoot watching all these holier than thou enlightened ego strokers thinking they got it off pat and looking down their dainty egocentric noses at the rest of humanity.

Something tells me most of these two bit chicken run dandy's in here are actually just second grade lily livered snotty types that think a whole lot far too much of themselves to be any good to anybody let alone themselves."

Very loving.

Moving on...as tAo suggested. He was right, in that several days ago I invited you to share your spiritual beliefs positively, rather than negatively. I said you could email them to me, and I'd include them in a post.

Or you could leave a comment, and I can copy the comment into a separate post -- which would make it easier to have a conversation about your views.

I sense a lot of anger toward this blog, and seekers of truth who question rather than obey or embrace blind faith. So I'm curious what makes you so upset. If you could describe why you think "churchless conversing" is objectionable, that'd be interesting to me and other blog visitors.

So far your comments have been in the vein of "I'm right!" and "You're wrong!" That's fine. Most people, including me, operate from this point of view a lot of the time.

I'm just suggesting that if you could explain why you think you're right, along with what you think you're right about, that'd help us move forward in a more courteous and intelligent fashion.

Brian, and yet....while upholding the hill people and telling initiates to leave their minds and sandals outside the door, they ensure that they are as well educated as possible eg: Charan and Jagat Singh; Gurinder's children are probably being educated in good schools and universities at the moment (Where? Does anyone know? Just curious). Kirpil Singh wrote that teachers and lecturers were unlikely to excel on the 'inner' planes.

Ashy,

One thing I notice about you is that you never address who you are responding to or directing your comments toward. That, coupled with your continued anger, sarcasm and ridicule of people that you don't know at all, but whom you perceive as being wayward and heretical, tells me that you actually have a pretty significant lack of spiritual, intellectual, and emotional maturity. You fail to realize that others here are actually quite older and far wiser and more experienced than you are, and we are simply not impressed by your manner or your rhetoric.

I politely asked you if you would share a little about yourself and what your own views are, instead of acting like an impudent troll spewing your own arrogance.

But instead of the "humble introspective truth seeking" and "love" that you speak of, you come back with just more condescending bullshit and shallow ridicule.

You said: "Takes a big man to recognize his own fallacy." -- Well then you must be a very small man (or woman).

Then you said (awflly ironically I might add): "Its all about love... nothing else"
-- Are you sure about that? Because you sure could of fooled me.

Anyway, we are still waiting to see if you will grow up and drop the games, and join in the discussion as you were invited to do.

Btw Ashy, I have another question for you:
Are you in South Africa by any chance ? (isn't S.A. about 9 time zones difference from the west coast of the USA?)

Catherine,

I think the children of Gurinder are in England in London/nearby, the elder one is married and the younger one is still studying. Even in satsangs of RSSB, it is said that intelligence or knowlege or questioning is the biggest hindrance on higher planes, though majority of the persons giving discourses in India are teachers.

Tao,

Remember the Brad commentor, from South Africa, a number of months back. Brad and ashy seem similiar.

My big problem with the fundamentalist mindset (particularly here in the US) is the fact they want to imbue all of society with their rigid beliefs. If they want to believe what they want to believe, fine. But when they want laws on the books that provide societal acquiescence for what they believe, then I have a BIG problem with it.

Thanks Juan. There are many specific questions I have that automatically follow on from your answer. You could probably guess them.

tAo, I sort of like the notion of handing out churchless pamphlets to true believers, satsangis or otherwise. But wouldn't this be proselytizing? I'm not sure whether actively promoting churchlessness is the way to go, or what purpose it would serve.

People have to come to see faith differently in their own way. Forcing a faithless conversion likely wouldn't be productive. Still, if you ever want to pursue your notion, I could point you to some of my favorite posts,

Only by chance... i found the reference to your great article on facebook. Although it's a long time ago since you wrote it and it's sometimes hard for me to make myself understood in english...

This is great! It helps me a lot. Bookmarked it - and will read the story again tomorrow :)

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Working...
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been posted. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

Working...

Post a comment

Your Information

(Name is required. Email address will not be displayed with the comment.)

Welcome


  • Welcome to the Church of the Churchless. If this is your first visit, click on "About this site--start here" in the Categories section below.
  • HinesSight
    Visit my other weblog, HinesSight, for a broader view of what's happening in the world of your Church unpastor, his wife, and dog.
  • BrianHines.com
    Take a look at my web site, which contains information about a subject of great interest to me: me.
  • Twitter with me
    Join Twitter and follow my tweets about whatever.
  • I Hate Church of the Churchless
    Can't stand this blog? Believe the guy behind it is an idiot? Rant away on our anti-site.
Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...